شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (پاییز 1403) منتشر شد


Volume 15, Issue 3 (8-2024)                   Social Problems of Iran 2024, 15(3): 291-324 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hatefirad L, Parsamehr M, Ruhani A. (2024). From Idealistic Thoughts to Practical Challenges of Dialogue in Parent-Child Relationships: A Grounded Theory in Yazd. Social Problems of Iran. 15(3), 291-324. doi:10.61186/jspi.15.3.291
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3742-en.html
1- Ph. D in Sociology, Adjunct Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Development Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran , parsamehr@umz.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
Abstract:   (163 Views)
One of the indicators of a healthy family is the establishment of favorable relations between parents and children, which has faced many changes from the past to the present. In this way, the family structure, the way parents interact with each other and their Parenting Styles, as well as the generation gap that exists between parents and children, plays a very important role in the formation of interactions between family members and creating an authoritarian or democratic context. Considering that the role of parents in the formation of interactions in the family is very important; The present study aims to explain the formation and status of dialogue between parents and children in Yazdi families. For this purpose, a qualitative approach and grounded theory method and theoretical sampling were used and 25 couples from normal families in Yazd were selected and interviewed in depth. The collected data were categorized into open, axial and selective coding includ 16 main categories, 67 secondary categories. To sum up, these categories were presented in one core category of "gap of Theory and Practice in dialogue with children". Accordingly, the paradigm model and theoretical scheme of the research were presented. The explanation of the results generally shows the gap between the subjective belief and the practical challenges in the interaction of parents and children, and it affects the dialogue situation in the family. In fact, although parents intellectually believe in establishing constructive interactions and dialogue with their children, but in practical terms due to time constraints, communication technologies, parents' culture and generation gap they are still involved with problems in the formation of interactions.
Full-Text [PDF 918 kb]   (68 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Original Research | Subject: Family & Marriage
Received: 2024/06/27 | Accepted: 2024/10/1 | Published: 2024/12/2

References
1. Aloia L.S. (2020). Parent–child relationship satisfaction: The influence of family communication orientations and relational maintenance behaviors. The Family Journal, 28(1), 83-89.
2. Elias, N., Lemish, D., & Rovner-Lev, G. (2021). Food for Thought: Parent-Child Face-to-Face Communication and Mobile Phone Use in Eaterie. Journal of Family Communication, 21(4), 272–286.
3. Hall, E.D., Shebib, S.J., & Scharp, K.M. (2021). The Mediating Role of Helicopter Parenting in the Relationship between Family Communication Patterns and Resilience in First-semester College Students. Journal of Family Communication, 21(1), 34-45.
4. Koerner, A. F. & Fitzpatrick M.A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family, Communication Studies, 48(1), 59-78.
5. Koerner, A. F., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (2006). Family Communication Patterns Theory: A Social Cognitive Approach. In D. O. Braithwaite & L. A. Baxter (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 50–65). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalism inquiry, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Mauthner, N., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis, Sociology, 37(3), 413-431. Sociology, 37(3), 413-431.
8. Miller-Day, M. (2017). Family Communication. In Jon Nussbaum (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Scharp, k.m., & Thomas, L.J. (2018). Making Meaning of the Parent–Child Relationship: A Dialogic Analysis of Parent-Initiated Estrangement Narratives, Journal of Family Communication, 18(4), 302-316.
10. Singh, R., & Nayak, J.K. (2016). Parent-adolescent conflict and choice of conflict resolution strategy: Familial holiday planning, International Journal of Conflict Management, 27(1), 88-115.
11. Vanassche, S., Sodermans, A. K., Matthijs, K., Swicegood, G. (2014). The Effect of family types, Family Relationships and Parental Role Models on Delinquency and Alcohol use Among Flemish Adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(1), 128-143.
12. Visser, M., Overbeek M. M., De Schipper, J. C., Schoemaker, K., Lamers-Winkelman, F. & Finkenauer, C. (2016). Mother–child emotion dialogues in families exposed to interparental violence. Journal of Child Custody, 13(2-3), 178-198.
13. Abbasi shavazi, m.j., & Askari nadoushan, A. (2008). Development ideals and family attitudes in Iran (a case study of the city of Yazd). Namehye Olume Ejtemai, 16(34), 49-72.
14. Asl Dehqan, F., Rezaeian Faraji, H & Hosseinian, S. (2019). The Role of Family Flexibility and Maternal Self-Differentiation in Adolescents’ Self-Efficacy. Journal of the Woman and Families Cultural-Educational, 13(45), 55-73.
15. Azadarmaki, T. (2016). Changes, Challenges and the Future of the Iranian Family, Tehran: Teesa Publication.
16. Baghi Nasrabadi, A. (1387). Sociology of Family.Tehran: University of Applied Sciences.
17. Bradshaw, J. (2007). Family (Family Systems Analysis).Translated by Mahdi QaracheDaghi, Tehran: Liusa Publication.
18. Cheal, D. (2009). Families in today's world. Translated by Mohamad mehdi labibi, Tehran: Afkar publication.
19. Faridizad, F., Heidari, M.R., & Neyestani, M.R. (2020).A Study of the Relationship between Dialog-Centeredness in the Family and Autonomy of Children and its Educational Explanation. Journal of the Women and Families Cultural-Educational, 14(49), 7-23.
20. Ghafoori Zarch M R. (2021). The Effectiveness of Parent Verbal Communication Training in Reducing Conflicts and Improving Mother-Daughter Relationships among Seventh and Eighth Grade High School Girls in Yazd. Quarterly Journal of Family and Research, 18(3), 11-24.
21. Giddens, A. (2007). The Third Way. The Renewal of Social Democracy. Translated by Manouchehr Sabouri Kashani, Tehran: Shiraze Publication.
22. Hariri, N. (2006). Principles and methods of qualitative research, Tehran: Islamic Azad University.
23. Institute for Cultural Studies and Communication. (2022). Lack of intergenerational dialogue has effected the family. Available at: https://www.ihcs.ac.ir/communication/fa/news/22601.
24. Khaniki, H. (2004). Dialogue, From Linguistic Connotation to Global Meaning. Iranian Journal Linguistic Connotation to Global Meaning, 5(1), 90-113.
25. Mehdinezhad qoushchi, R. & Asadpour, E. (2019). Identification of the Indicators of Effective Communication between Couples: A Phenomenological Study. Women and Families Cultural-Educational, 13(44), 67-88.
26. Mohammad Taghi Abbasi shavazi, M.T., karami, F., & Abbasi-Atashgah, P. (2021). New Communication Technologies and Family: The study of the relationship between new media usage and parental-child relations among high school students in Shiraz city. Society Culture Media, 10(40), 71-89.
27. Neuman, W.L. (2014). Social Research Methods Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Translated by Abolhasan Faghihi and Asal Aghaz, Tehran: Termeh Publication.
28. Neyestani, M.R. (2011). Principls and Foundations of Dialogue: Way of Knowing and Educating. Isfahan: Yaremana.
29. Sadeghi, M. (2012). Little Book of Dialogue.Tehran: Imam Musa Sadr Cultural & Research Institute.
30. Safiri, Kh., & Shayesteh, S. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between Family Social Capital and Youth Social Health. Journal of Social Work, 4(3), 5-17.
31. Sarokhani, B., Nazari, F., & Vosoughi, M. (2017). A Sociological study of the relationship between social trust and human communication, emphasizing families of Tehran city in the years 1393 to 1395. Urban Studies, 7(23), 1-30.
32. Saroukhani, B. & Doodman, L. (2010). The Structure of Power in Family and its Effect on Social Participation. Sociological Studies of Youth, 1(1), 105-129.
33. Sayadi, P., & Ataee, P. (2017). Sociological Analysis of the Impact of Internet Use on Family Relationships. Journal of Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University of Shushtar, 11(2), 313-342.
34. Shafiabadi, A., Navabinejad SH., Falsafinejad, M.R., & Najaflooy, F. (2012). Comparing interactions pattern in families with and without substance dependent member and providing appropriate interventionist strategies. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 1(3), 264-283.
35. Shahraki sanavi, F., Navidian, A., Ansari moghadam, A., & Farajy shoy, M. (2011). The Relationship of Family Communication Patterns on Life Quality in Adolescents. Journal of Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 1(1), 101-114.
36. Sotoudeh, H. & Bahari, S. (2007). Family pathology. Tehran: Nedaye Ariana. Masomeh.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Social Problems of Iran

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb