شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (پاییز 1403) منتشر شد
Volume 14, Issue 1 (10-2023)
Social Problems of Iran 2023, 14(1): 163-190 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shahbazi Z, Mobaraki M, Mostafavi N S. (2023). Investigating quality of life as an indicator of social development among the provinces of Iran. Social Problems of Iran. 14(1), 163-190. doi:10.61186/jspi.14.1.163
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3628-en.html
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3628-en.html
1- , shahbazi@acecr.ac.ir
Abstract: (976 Views)
Today, quality of life, as a substitute for material well-being and as response to one-dimensional development and one of the most important indicators of social development, is the main social goal of countries. As far as the nature of the development model in Iran is authoritarian, negative, one-dimensional and has created inequality, it is necessary to examine the quality of life. This article deals with quality of life as an indicator of social development. In the framework of the secondary analysis methodology, after dealing with the methodological challenges and achieving 42 indicators in both objective and subjective categories, the ranking has been done based on the national average. According to the findings: Tehran, Yazd, Semnan, Bushehr, first to fourth rank, Isfahan, Alborz, Mazandaran, Qazvin, Markazi, rank 5 to 9 - Qom, Zanjan, Ilam, Khorasan Razavi, Gilan, South Khorasan, Fars, Khuzestan, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Chaharmahal Bakhtiari, East Azerbaijan and Hamedan are ranked 10 to 21 - Golestan, Ardabil, Kerman, Hormozgan, Kermanshah, Kurdistan, Lorestan, North Khorasan, West Azerbaijan are ranked 22 to 30th and Sistan and Baluchestan is 31th.
Type of Article: Original Research |
Subject:
Culture
Received: 2023/07/5 | Accepted: 2023/09/28 | Published: 2023/10/9
Received: 2023/07/5 | Accepted: 2023/09/28 | Published: 2023/10/9
References
1. Baldwin, S., & Godfrey, C. (1994). Qulity of life: perspective and policies. New York: Routledge.
2. Bennet, c., & Lenihan, D. (2001). Measuring quality of life the use of societal outcomes by parliamentarian.
3. Study protocol for the World Health Organizationproject to develop a quality of life assessment instrument. Quality of Life Research. No.2.
4. Campbell, A. (1976). SLbjective measures of well-being. American Psychologist, 31, 117-124. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.31.2.117]
5. Costanza, R. (2007). Quality of life: An approach intergating opportunities human needs and subjective well-being. ecological economics Vol, 267-276. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.02.023]
6. Currie, J., & Develin, E. (2002). Stroll your way to wellbeing: A survey of the perceived benefits, barriers, community supportand stigma associated with pram walking groups designed for newmothers". Health Care for Women International. Vol. 23, No. 8. [DOI:10.1080/07399330290112380]
7. Cutter, S. (1985). Rating places: a geographers view on quality of life. new york: recource publications in geography.
8. Das, D. (2008). Urban Quality of life: a case study of Guwahati. social indicators research, 88. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-007-9191-6]
9. Diner, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Money and Happiness: Income and subjective well-being. Cambridge: MIT press.
10. Diwan, R. (2000). Relational wealth and the quality of life. journal of socio-economics vol 29, 305-340. [DOI:10.1016/S1053-5357(00)00073-1]
11. Economist Intelligence Unit. (2005). Quality of Life Indexation.
12. Epley, D., & Menon, M. (2008). A method of assembling crossectional indicator into a community quality of life. social indicator research No 88, 281-296. [DOI:10.1007/s11205-007-9190-7]
13. ESCAPE. (1988). Jakarta of action on human resources development in the ESCAPE resion. bangkok.
14. Foo, T. (2000). subjective assessment of urben quality of life in singapore. habitat international Vol 24. No 1, 21-29. [DOI:10.1016/S0197-3975(99)00026-0]
15. Hagerty, M., & et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: review and agenda for research. Social Indicators Research Vol. 55, No. 1. [DOI:10.1023/A:1010811312332]
16. Ida Kubiszewskia, N. Z. (2018). Objective and Subjective Indicators of Life Satisfaction in Australia: How Well Do People Perceive What Supports a Good Life? Ecological Economics 154, 315-361. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.08.017]
17. Janse, A.J. et al. (2004). Quality of life: patients and doctors don't always agree: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. Vol. 57 No. 7. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.11.013]
18. Liu, B. (1976). quality of life indicator in U.S metropolitan area: a statical analysis. New york: praeger.
19. Mallman, C. (1977). the needs and processes, goals and indicator paper presented for the GPID project of the united nation university.
20. Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjectiveand objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning 65, 73-83. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00239-6]
21. Massam, B. (2002). quality of life: public planning and private living. progress in planning, 141-227. [DOI:10.1016/S0305-9006(02)00023-5]
22. McGregor, A. (1982). A poverty of agency: resource management amongst poor people in Bangladesh. In: European Network of Bangladesh Studies Workshop. Bath: University of Bath.
23. Migdely. (2014). social development: theory & peractice. (فیروزآبادی، دباغی، Trans.) SAGE. poblication pub.
24. Moller, V., & Schlemmer, L. (1982). Quality of life in South Africa towards an instrument for the assessment of quality of life and basic needs. Social Indicators Research, No. 12. [DOI:10.1007/BF00319805]
25. Myers, D. (2000). Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54, 374-358. [DOI:10.1080/01944368808976495]
26. Noll, H. (2004). SOCIAL INDICATORS AND QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH BACKGROUND, ACHIEVEMENTS AND CURRENT TRENDS. Advances in Sociological Knowledge, 151-181. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-663-09215-5_7]
27. Pacione, M. (1985). The use of objective and subjective measures of quality of life in human geography. Progress in Human Geography Vol. 6, No. 4. [DOI:10.1177/030913258200600402]
28. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental qualiyt and human wellbeing a social geographical perspective. landescape and urban planning, 65(1-2). [DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00234-7]
29. Pal, A. (2005). Quality of life concept for the evaluation of societal development of rural community in west Bangal, India. Rural Development. No. 2. [DOI:10.1177/1018529120050205]
30. Raphael, D., et al. (1996). Measuring the Quality of Life in Older Persons: A Model with Implications for Community and Public Health Nursing. Toronto Center for Health Promotion, University of Toronto.
31. Romaniuk. (2015). THE SYSTEM OF STATISTICAL OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE INDICATORS OF MEASURING QUALITY OF LIFE. Economics, 4 (169), 46-52. [DOI:10.17721/1728-2667.2015/169-4/8]
32. Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam:North.
33. social progress imperative. (2015). social progress index, final report.
34. Stiglitz, J. (2002). participation and development: persepactives from the comperehansive development paradigm. review of development economics vol 6, 163-182. [DOI:10.1111/1467-9361.00148]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
