1. علیوردینیا، اکبر؛ ملکدار، اعظم و حسنی، محمدرضا (1392). تخلفات رایانهای در میان دانشجویان دانشگاه مازندران: آزمون تجربی نظریۀ یادگیری اجتماعی ایکرز. مجله جامعهشناسی ایران، 15(2): 24-56.
2. علیوردینیا، اکبر و ریسمانچی، ناهید (1398). تأثیر بزهدیدگی سایبری و سنتی بر رفتارهای انحرافی دانشجویان. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی راهبرد فرهنگ، 12(45): 97-130.
3. علیوردینیا، اکبر و قربانزادهسیاهکلرودی، فائزه (۱۳۹۹). بررسی جامعهشناختی بزهدیدگی ناشی از آزاررسانی سایبری در میان دانشجویان دانشگاه مازندران. مسائل اجتماعی ایران (دانشگاه خوارزمی)، ۱۰ (۱): ۱۴۵-۱۶۹.
4. صدیقیانبیدگلی، آمنه (1400). وضعیت انحرافات سایبری در میان دانشجویان دانشگاههای تهران. فصلنامه مطالعات فرهنگ و ارتباطات، 1(1): 1-21.
5. آهنگرقربانی، زهره؛ عطادخت، اکبر؛ معزز، رقیه و سپهرینسب، زهرا (1398). نقش میانجی تکانشگری در رابطۀ صفات سهگانه تاریک شخصیت با آزارگری سایبری: مطالعهای میان دانشجویان. فصلنامه پژوهشهای نوین روانشناختی، 14(54): 1-21.
6. ترکاشوند، معصومه و کرامتی، هادی (1400). پیشبینی انواع قلدری بر اساس زیرمقیاسهای گسست اخلاقی و هویت اخلاقی در دانشآموزان مقطع ابتدایی شهر تهران. تفکر و کودک، 12(2): 93-110.
7. حبیبیکلیبر، رامین و صیادی، صادق (1400). تأثیر انسجام خانوادگی و گروه همسالان با رفتارهای قلدرانه دانشآموزان. مطالعات جنسیت و خانواده، 9(1): 93-113.
8. علیوردینیا، اکبر و سهرابی، مریم (1394). تحلیل اجتماعی قلدری در میان دانش آموزان (مطالعه موردی دوره متوسطه شهر ساری). مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی -فرهنگی، ۴ (۱): ۳۹-۹.
9. رسولی، الهام؛ عباسی، رسول و معینی، حسین (1397). بررسی تأثیر کیفیت خدمات الکترونیکی بر قصد خرید اینترنتی کتاب با نقش میانجی اعتماد و تصویر شرکت. کتابداری و اطلاعرسانی، 21(1): 153-179.
10. عطادخت، اکبر؛ احمدی، شیرین و فلاحی، وحید (1399). بررسی الگوی روابط ساختاری پرخاشگری سایبری بر اساس استرس ادراکشده با نقش میانجی وابستگی به شبکههای مجازی در دانشجویان دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی در سال ۱۳۹۸: یک مطالعه توصیفی. مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان، ۱۹ (۳): ۲۶۴-۲۵۱.
11. Abaido, G. M. (2020). Cyberbullying on social media platforms among university students in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 407-420. [
DOI:10.1080/02673843.2019.1669059]
12. Akarsu, Ö., Budak, M. İ., & Okanlı, A. (2022). The relationship of childhood trauma with cyberbullying and cyber victimization among university students. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 41, 181-187. [
DOI:10.1016/j.apnu.2022.06.004]
13. Baier, D., Hong, J. S., Kliem, S., & Bergmann, M. C. (2019). Consequences of bullying on adolescents' mental health in Germany: Comparing face-to-face bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(9), 2347-2357. [
DOI:10.1007/s10826-018-1181-6]
14. Barton-Crosby, J., & Hirtenlehner, H. (2021). The role of morality and self-control in conditioning the criminogenic effect of provocation. A partial test of situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 42(10), 1273-1294. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2020.1738645]
15. Bernardo, A. B., Galve-González, C., Cervero, A., & Tuero, E. (2022). Cyberbullying in first-year university students and its influence on their intentions to drop out. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-15. [
DOI:10.1080/07294360.2022.2057447]
16. Camacho, S., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2014). Understanding the factors that influence the perceived severity of cyber-bullying. Paper presented at the International Conference on HCI in Business. [
DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_13]
17. Cao, X., Khan, A. N., Ali, A., & Khan, N. A. (2019). Consequences of cyberbullying and social overload while using SNSs: A study of users' discontinuous usage behavior in SNSs. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(1), 1-14.
18. Craig, J. M. (2019). Extending situational action theory to white-collar crime. Deviant Behavior, 40(2), 171-186. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2017.1420444]
19. Donat, M., Willisch, A., & Wolgast, A. (2022). Cyber-bullying among university students: Concurrent relations to belief in a just world and to empathy. Current Psychology, 1-14. [
DOI:10.1007/s12144-022-03239-z]
20. Foody, M., Samara, M., & Carlbring, P. (2015). A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy. Internet Interventions, 2(3), 235-242. [
DOI:10.1016/j.invent.2015.05.002]
21. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of suicide research, 14(3), 206-221. [
DOI:10.1080/13811118.2010.494133]
22. Hirtenlehner, H., & Hardie, B. (2016). On the conditional relevance of controls: An application of Situational Action Theory to shoplifting. Deviant Behavior, 37(3), 315-331. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2015.1026764]
23. Hirtenlehner, H., & Treiber, K. (2017). Can situational action theory explain the gender gap in adolescent shoplifting? Results from Austria. International Criminal Justice Review, 27(3), 165-187. [
DOI:10.1177/1057567717690199]
24. Kabiri, S., Shadmanfaat, S. M., Samuels-Wortley, K., & Gallupe, O. (2020). Does Moral Identity Matter in Situational Action Theory? Some Evidence of Iranian Fans' Cyberbullying Perpetration. International Criminal Justice Review, 30(4), 406-420. [
DOI:10.1177/1057567720941584]
25. Kabiri, S., Shadmanfaat, S. M. S., Choi, J., & Yun, I. (2020). The impact of life domains on cyberbullying perpetration in Iran: A partial test of Agnew's general theory of crime. Journal of Criminal Justice, 66, 1-30. doi: [
DOI:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2019.101633]
26. Lee, S.-S., Song, H., & Park, J. H. (2021). Exploring risk and protective factors for cyberbullying and their interplay: evidence from a sample of South Korean college students. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(24), 13415. [
DOI:10.3390/ijerph182413415]
27. Li, C. K., Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., & May, D. C. (2016). Examining the mediating effects of social learning on the low self-control-Cyberbullying relationship in a youth sample. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 126-138. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2014.1004023]
28. Liu, W., Qiu, G., & Zhang, S. (2022). Situational action theory and school bullying: Rethinking the moral filter. Crime & Delinquency, 68(4), 572-593. [
DOI:10.1177/0011128720974318]
29. Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31(1), 1-14. [
DOI:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02066.x]
30. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth and Society, 43(2), 727-751. [
DOI:10.1177/0044118X10366951]
31. Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2013). Cyberbullying among adolescents: Implications for empirical research. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(4), 431-432. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.07.030]
32. Piquero, A. R., Bouffard, J. A., Piquero, N. L., & Craig, J. M. (2016). Does Morality Condition the Deterrent Effect of Perceived Certainty Among Incarcerated Felons? Crime & Delinquency, 62(1), 3-25. [
DOI:10.1177/0011128713505484]
33. Schoepfer, A., & Piquero, A. R. (2006). Self-control, moral beliefs, and criminal activity. Deviant Behavior, 27(1), 51-71. [
DOI:10.1080/016396290968326]
34. Masoomeh (Shamila) Shadmanfaat, S., Kabiri, S., Smith, H., & Cochran, J. K. (2020). A longitudinal study of Iranian fans' cyberbullying: The utility of social learning theory. Deviant Behavior, 41(12), 1616-1635. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2019.1637996]
35. Shadmanfaat, S., Kabiri, S., Miley, L. N., Howell, C. J., Muniz, C. N., & Cochran, J. K. (2020). Performance Enhancing Drug Use Among Professional Athletes: Testing the Applicability of Key Theoretical Concepts Derived From Situational Action Theory. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 44(4), 336-355. [
DOI:10.1177/0193723520919812]
36. Shadmanfaat, S., Kabiri, S., Miley, L. N., Howell, C. J., Muniz, C. N., & Cochran, J. K. (2020). Performance enhancing drug use among professional athletes: Testing the applicability of key theoretical concepts derived from situational action theory. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 44(4), 336-355. [
DOI:10.1177/0193723520919812]
37. Shadmanfaat, S., Richardson, D. A., Muniz, C. N., Cochran, J. K., Kabiri, S., & Howell, C. J. (2021). Cyberbullying against rivals: Application of key theoretical concepts derived from situational action theory. Deviant Behavior, 42(12), 1549-1564. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2020.1762452]
38. Shadmanfaat, S. M., Choi, J., Kabiri, S., & Lee, J. (2021). Impact of social concern on cyberbullying perpetration in Iran: Direct, indirect, mediating, and conditioning effects in Agnew's social concern theory. Deviant Behavior, 42(11), 1436-1457. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2020.1753152]
39. Shadmanfaat, S. M., Choi, J., Kabiri, S., & Yun, I. (2020). Assessing the links between parenting practices, moral emotions, and cyberbullying perpetrations among a sample of Iranian sports fans. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 64(16), 1674-1695. [
DOI:10.1177/0306624X20923252]
40. Shadmanfaat, S. M. S., Howell, C. J. M., Muniz, C. N., Cochran, J. K., Kabiri, S., & Richardson, D. A. (2018). The predictive ability of self-control and differential association on sports fans' decision to engage in cyber bullying perpetration against rivals. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 12(2), 362-379.
41. Shadmanfaat, S. M., Howell, C. J., Muniz, C. N., Cochran, J. K., Kabiri, S., & Fontaine, E. M. (2020). Cyberbullying perpetration: An empirical test of social learning theory in Iran. Deviant Behavior, 41(3), 278-293. [
DOI:10.1080/01639625.2019.1565513]
42. Song, H., & Lee, S.-S. (2021). Motivations, propensities, and their interplays on online bullying perpetration: A partial test of situational action theory. Crime & Delinquency, 66(12), 1787-1808. [
DOI:10.1177/0011128719850500]
43. Vazsonyi, A. T., Machackova, H., Sevcikova, A., Smahel, D., & Cerna, A. (2012). Cyberbullying in context: Direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 210-227. [
DOI:10.1080/17405629.2011.644919]
44. Wang, L., & Ngai, S. S.-y. (2020). The effects of anonymity, invisibility, asynchrony, and moral disengagement on cyberbullying perpetration among school-aged children in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105613. [
DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105613]
45. Wang, X., Yang, L., Yang, J., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Trait anger and cyberbullying among young adults: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and moral identity. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 519-526. [
DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.073]
46. Wei, H., Ding, H., Liu, M., & He, A. (2022). The relationship between filial piety belief and cyberbullying perpetration among Chinese university students: A conditional process analysis. Current Psychology, 1-10. [
DOI:10.1007/s12144-022-03518-9]
47. Wikström, P. O. H. (2019). Explaining crime and criminal careers: The DEA model of situational action theory. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology, 6, 188-203. [
DOI:10.1007/s40865-019-00116-5]
48. Wikström, P.-O. H., Oberwittler, D., Treiber, K., & Hardie, B. (2012). Breaking rules: The social and situational dynamics of young people's urban crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Wikström, P.-O. H., & Svensson, R. (2010). When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 7(5), 395-410. [
DOI:10.1177/1477370810372132]
50. Wikström, P.-O. H., & Treiber, K. H. (2009). Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict and Violence (IJCV), 3(1), 75-96.
51. Wikström, P. O. H. (2014). Why crime happens: A situational action theory. In G. Manzo (Ed.), Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks (First Edition ed., pp. 71-94): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [
DOI:10.1002/9781118762707.ch03]
52. Wikström, P. O. H., & Bouhana, N. (2017). Analyzing radicalization and terrorism: A situational action theory. The handbook of the criminology of terrorism, 25(2), 175-186. [
DOI:10.1002/9781118923986.ch11]
53. Wikström, P. O. H., & Treiber, K. (2015). Situational Theory: The Importance of Interactions and Action Mechanisms in the Explanation of Crime. In A. R. Piquero (Ed.), The Handbook of Criminological Theory (Vol. 4, pp. 4415-4444). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [
DOI:10.1002/9781118512449.ch22]