شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (بهار 1403) منتشر شد

Volume 15, Issue 1 (4-2024)                   Social Problems of Iran 2024, 15(1): 185-220 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Maddahi J, faizi I. (2024). The Problem of Divorce: Theater of Tears and Smiles; Qualitative Study of Tehran women's Experience of Divorce (Contexts and Causes). Social Problems of Iran. 15(1), 185-220.
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3693-en.html
1- , gmaddahi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (61 Views)
The institution of the family, as the first and most important socializing institution, has faced serious challenges in modern human life. In fact, the basic gesture of the transcendental turn of the postmodern world represents the change in the meanings of life, new intellectual styles and, accordingly, the change of important social positions, including the family. The aim of the current research was to study qualitatively the experience of women from divorce in Tehran city, which was done with qualitative methodology and grounded theory method. For this purpose, in-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 39 divorced women in Tehran, who were selected by purposeful sampling and snowball strategy. In the data analysis stage, 131 open codes, 20 sub-categories, 6 main categories and one core category were extracted through the data coding system: pluralism in the experience of forms of violence, the desire to be free from restrictions and separation from control, husband's tendency to extramarital relationships, spouse's personality-spiritual problems, the stigma of divorce (from rejection of others to being a sexual prey), contact with the opposite sex after divorce, break from communal life. Also, "divorce: the dialectical tragedy of tears and smiles" was chosen as the core category and finally the paradigm model extracted from the data was set. The findings indicate that the explanation and interpretation of the request for divorce has made this issue completely objective and involved in different dualities of satisfaction and dissatisfaction, positive and negative, and the desire to be freed from many hardships. This semantic dualism and paradox do not reflect a uniform analysis and understanding of the field of divorce.
Full-Text [PDF 734 kb]   (33 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Review | Subject: Social problems
Received: 2024/01/20 | Accepted: 2024/02/26 | Published: 2024/06/14

1. Abbaszadeh, M., Saeidi Ataei, H. & Afshari, Z. (2015). A Study of Some Modernity’s Factors Effective on Women’s Tendency toward Divorce (Research Subjects: Married Women in Zanjan). Strategic Research on Social Problems, 4(1), 25-44. (in Persian)
2. Afrasiabi, H., Barzideh, K. & Javadian, S. R. (2020). Fluctuate Accommodation in Social Interaction by Cancer Patients; a Qualitative Study in Ahwaz. Journal of Applied Sociology, 31(1), 1-16. (in Persian)
3. Agbo, B. O., Agbo, C. C. & Gloria, C. (2023). Effect of Digital Infidelity in Marital Communication among Couples in Enugu Metropolis. International Journal of Media, Security & Development (IJMSD), 8:1.
4. Amarsanaa, K., Kovács, M. & Rácz, J. (2024). “I established a life; I can re-establish it again”: Lived experiences of intimate partner violence in Mongolia. Acta psychologica, 242, 104118.
5. Armand, Mohammadali and Azhdari, Aram (2017). Women’s life after divorce with a qualitative approach (case study: Shahin Dej city). Journal of Sociological Research, 12(3), 8-25. (in Persian)
6. Bahoosh, S., Ghodrati, S. & Ghodrati, H. (2022). Relationship between Alienation and the Tendency to Divorce among Women in the City of Mashhad. Journal of Population Association of Iran, 17(33), 365-394. (in Persian)
7. Bauman, Zygmunt (2004), Liquid Love; about the instability of human bonds. Translated by Irfan Sabeti, Tehran: Qaqnoos. (in Persian)
8. Beheshtiyan, M. & Abdi, F. (2022). The relationship between personality traits and intimacy as predictors of divorce tendency in women living in Tehran. Women Studies, 13(39), 71-89. (in Persian)
9. Bozoyan, C. & Schmiedeberg, C. (2023). What is infidelity? A vignette study on norms and attitudes toward infidelity. The Journal of Sex Research, 60(8), 1090-1099.
10. Chang, M. (2024). Changing marital transitions and homeownership among young households. Review of Economic Dynamics, 52, 46-63.
11. DePoy, E. & Gitlin, L. (2005) Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies. Michigan: Mosby.
12. Dehbani pour, R., khorampour, Y. & sheykhi, E. (2019). Experimental investigation of the influence of mass media in promoting cultural elements of postmodernism: Case Study: Youth Yazd. Interdisciplinary Studies in Media and Culture, 8(2), 99-125.
13. Fars news agency, https://www.farsnews.ir/news/14011109000744. (in Persian)
14. Fouladiyan, M., BaradaranKashani, Z. & Dayyari, M. (2021). Qualitative study of forming extra marriage affairs (Case Study: Women and men Divorce applicant in Mashhad). Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 10(1), 1-37.
15. Glenn, Ward (2016). Postmodernism. Translated by Qadir Fakhr Ranjbari and Abuzar Karmi, 6th edition, Tehran: Mahi Publications. (in Persian)
16. Grimaldi, Nicola (2020), Man in pieces, translated by Abbas Bagheri. Tehran: Ney. (in Persian)
17. HI Rehim, M. KS Alshamsi, W. & Kaba, A. (2020). Perceptions of divorcees towards factors leading to divorce in UAE. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 61(8), 582-592.
18. Hartarto, R. B. & Hajar, I. (2024). Television Viewing and Divorce in Indonesia: Evidence from Macro Data. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 32, 1-13.
19. Itzen, D. Stanley, Bakazin, Makzin & Smith, Kelly Itzen (2016), Translated by Houshang Naybi, Culture, Art, Communication Research Institute. (in Persian)
20. Kadiradjieva, L. & Alekseeva, V. S. (2023). Relationship Dissatisfaction and Other Risk Factors for Divorce on the Example of Norway. Eurasian Journal of Learning and Academic Teaching, 16, 35-37.
21. Kaloyanov, Radostin (2018), Hegel, Cojou, Lacan: Dialectic Metamorphoses, translated by Ehsan Karimkhani, Tehran: Scientific-Cultural Publications. (in Persian)
22. Karina, I. & Banjarnahor, J. W. (2024). Domestic Violence Permitted by Husband Against Wife from a Criminological Perspective. Anayasa: Journal of Legal Studies, 1(2), 64-78.
23. Kessler, Dirk (2014), Current Sociological Theories, from Eisenshot to Postmoderns, translated by Kazamatullah Rasakh, Tehran: Age Publishing House.
24. Lesh, Scott (2016), Postmodern Sociology, translated by Shapour Behbahan, Tehran: Qognos. (in Persian)
25. Maddahi, J., zare, B., Serajzadeh, S. H. & Habibpour Gotabi, K. (2021). The Problem of Celibacy: The Emerging Subject and New Life among Girls in Tehran. Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 12(1), 7-43. (in Persian)
26. Maurya, P. (2024). Family Court Roles and Authorities in Addressing Domestic Violence in India. Ldealistic Journal of Advanced Research in Progressive Spectrums (IJARPS) eISSN–2583-6986, 3(01), 8-12.
27. Merriam, S. (2009) Qualitative Research: a Guide to Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Mostadam, Zahra, Rezaei, Sharif Ali & Sarami, Hamid Reza (2023). The lived experience of women applying for divorce with a drug-addicted husband: a phenomenological study, Scientific Addiction Research Quarterly, 17(70), 55-78. (in Persian)
29. Moumen, A., Shafqat, A., Alraqad, T., Alshawarbeh, E. S., Saber, H. & Shafqat, R. (2024). Divorce prediction using machine learning algorithms in Ha’il region, KSA. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 502.
30. Moumen, A., Shafqat, A., Alraqad, T., Alshawarbeh, E. S., Saber, H. & Shafqat, R. (2024). Divorce prediction using machine learning algorithms in Ha’il region, KSA. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 502. (in Persian)
31. Munyoki, D. M., Katola, M. T., Michael, T. & Mwaura, P. (2023). Factors Influencing Sexual Infidelity among the Married in Africa Inland Church-Kitui County, Kenya. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(4), 714-721.
32. Parker, G., Durante, K. M., Hill, S. E. & Haselton, M. G. (2022). Why women choose divorce: An evolutionary perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 43, 300-306.
33. Pathak, A. (2020). Crimes against women as a correlate of incidents of Divorce in India. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 8, 397-408.
34. Patoari, M. M. H. (2020). Socio-Economic and Cultural Causes and Effects of Increasing Divorce Rate by Women in Bangladesh: A Critical Analysis. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(1), 21.
35. Rokach, A. & Chan, S. H. (2023). Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3904.
36. Seidman, Steven (2010). Conflict of Votes in Sociology, Translated by Hadi Jalili, first edition, Tehran: Ney. (in Persian)
37. Sennett, Richard (2002a). Respect in a World of Unequality. New York (Dt. Respekt im Zeitalter der Ungleichheit. Berlin.
38. Sennett, Richard (2002b). Amerika und die Macht des Scheiterns. Richard.
39. Sharifi Saei, M. H. & Azad Armaki, T. (2022). The Factors of Marital Infidelity in Iran; A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 12(2), 33-74. (in Persian)
40. Sharifi Sa’i, Mohammad Hossein (2023). Consequences of marital infidelity in Iran; Metacomposite study. Contemporary Sociological Research, 12(22), 165-204. (in Persian)
41. Yarinasab F, Amini K. (2020). Prevalence and Types of Violence against Women Seeking Divorce Referred to the Forensic Medicine Organization; a Case Study of Boyer-Ahmad County. Iran J Forensic, 25(4), 39-44. (in Persian)
42. Zare, B., Serajzadeh S. H., Habibpour Gotabi K. & Maddahi, J. (2020). Single youth life: a socio-cultural problem (An analytical approach based on the views of Jean Baudrillard and Richard Sennett). Social Problems of Iran. 11(2), 97-123. (in Persian)
43. Zhinapour, M. & Baharluoei, M. (2020). Escaping the marital life poor circuit: Exploring the meaning and process of infidelity formation. Journal of Social Problems of Iran, 10(2), 179-200. (in Persian)
44. Žižek, Slavi (2022). Spinoza, Kant, Hegel, translated by Navid Gergin, Tehran: Shabkhiz Publishing House. (in Persian)

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Social Problems of Iran

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb