شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (پاییز 1403) منتشر شد
Volume 15, Issue 3 (8-2024)
Social Problems of Iran 2024, 15(3): 49-90 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
irankhah M, nabavi S H, hajiani E. (2024). Effective Drivers for Changing Social Values Aimed at Desired Government in Today's Iran. Social Problems of Iran. 15(3), 49-90. doi:10.61186/jspi.15.3.49
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3658-en.html
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3658-en.html
1- Ph. D. Student of Social Problems of Iran, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran ,Nabavi@khu.ac.ir
3- Associate Professor in Sociology, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Associate Professor in Sociology, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (119 Views)
The main issue of the present article is the changes in the field of social values (from the people's point of view) aimed at the desired government, which has been addressed with two main goals; 1- Finding these values in today's Iranian society; and 2- Identifying and prioritizing the driving forces affecting their change in the next decade. In terms of methodology, it is a forward-looking and applied research, based on the critical realism paradigm. From qualitative content analysis methods, ecology and S.T.E.E.P.V model, interaction analysis; library study techniques, open coding, expert panel, Likert scale questionnaire, interaction matrix and MicMac software; and purposive sampling, snowball, and available experts are used. The findings in response to the first question indicate that democracy, meritocracy, optimal performance, transparency, legality, accountability, rational legitimacy of government, all-round development and problem solving, prosperity, security, existence of civil institutions, flow free information and the possibility of participation and making demands, reducing corruption, justice and freedom in various fields, independence, and international dignity, existing social values (from the people's point of view) are aimed at the desired government. In response to the second question, the findings show that the three drivers of the emergence of the elite class after the war and the revelation of the symbols and signs of wealth and its confrontation with the values of the 1979 revolution, the absence of a suitable space for expressing the people's wishes and the lack of fulfillment their demands in the laws, structure and context of government, as well as reading and radical and fundamentalist interpretation of religion by the government are the most key variables of the system and the most influential drivers on the change of social values (from the people's point of view) aimed at the desired government. In addition, the 7 drivers such as "lack of desirable governance components (democracy, development, rule of law)", "existence of discrimination, inequality and injustice (religious, gender, class, place and ethnicity)", "concealment, lying, hypocrisy and lack of transparency in the behavior and speech of the officials", "reducing the role of expert elites and increasing the role of non-specialist supporters (government)", "existence of corruption (administrative, economic and political)", unfavorable performance and inefficiency of political and administrative structures" and "all kinds of gaps (religious, gender, generational, political, cultural, social and economic)" have the potential to join the category of the key drivers affecting the change of values, make the direction and intensity of these mentioned changes and as a result make the upcoming futures more different.
Keywords: Future Research, Change Of Values, Values Aimed At Optimal Governance, Cross Impact Analysis, Key Drivers, Micmac Software
Type of Article: Original Research |
Subject:
Security
Received: 2024/02/6 | Accepted: 2024/02/24 | Published: 2024/12/2
Received: 2024/02/6 | Accepted: 2024/02/24 | Published: 2024/12/2
References
1. Bag, Surajit & Anand, Neeraj (2014). Modeling Green Supply Chain Management framework using ISM and MICMAC analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 8(22), 1053-1065. DOI: 10.5897/AJBM2013.7307
2. Maio, Gregory (2010). Mental Representations of Social Values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 1-43.
3. Omran, Ahmed, Khorish, Motza & Saleh, Mohamed (2014). Structural Analysis with Knowledge-based MICMAC Approach. International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 – 8887). 86(5), 39-43.
4. Rosu, Ana-Maria, Pierrot-Deseilligny, Marc, Delorme, Arthur, Binet, Renaud & Klinger, Yann (2015). Measurement of ground displacement from optical satellite image correlation using the free open-source software MicMac. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 100, 48-59.
5. Torres, Nathalia & Olaya, Camilo (2010). Tacking the mess: System conceptualization through cross-impact analysis. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference of the System Dynamic Society. Seoul, Korea.
6. Woods, Nagire (1999). Good governance in international organizations. Global governance a Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 5(1), 39-61.
7. Abadian, Hosein (2011). Contemporary political history of Iran: the crisis of constitutionalty in Iran. Tehran: Political studies and research intitute.
8. Albrow, Martin (2001). Introduction to sociology (Manouchehr Sabouri, translator). Tehran: Ney.
9. Ale Yasin, Ahmad (2020). Causes of underdevelopment in Iran. Tehran: Pezhvake Keyvan.
10. Almasi, Kurosh (2023, April 7). Foundations of political values. Shargh news and analysis portal. Https://www.sharghdaily.com.
11. Ardebili, Haleh (2001). The shifting values and the developmental process. Economic research, 2, 185.
12. Asadi, Ali & Tehranian, Majid, through the effort of Abdi, Abbas & Goodarzi, Mohsen (2018). A voice that went unheard: social-cultural attitudes and uneven development in Iran, a report on the finding of the foresight study. Tehran: Ney.
13. Ashoori, Dariush (2006). Encyclopedia of political thought: dictionary of political terms and ideologies. Tehran: Morvarid.
14. Athari, Seyed Hosein & Hoseini Davarani, Seyed Abbas (2015). The approach of cultural change and the constructed model of "closed-loop collective action" in societies benefiting from survival values: a case study of Egypt. Political sociology of Islamic world, 2(2), 135-155.
15. Azodanlou, Hamid (2016). Introduction to the fundamental concepts of sociology. Tehran: Ney.
16. Boudon, Raymond (2010). Studies on the work of classical sociologist 2 (Bagher Parham, translator). Tehran: Markaz.
17. Davarani, Hosein (2012). An analysis of democracy aspirations in early 21st century Arab movements using Ronald inglehart's theory of cultural change (master's thesis), university of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
18. Eesazadegan, Ali (2012). System of value, personality, and change. Marifat, 21(179), 79-93.
19. Fakhraii, Marziyeh & Keyghobadi, Marziyeh (2014). An overview of foresight methods: introduction to six important and widely-used techniques in futures studies. Tehran: Ayande Pajouh.
20. Freund, Julien (2004). The sociology of max weber (Abdolhosein Nikgohar, translator). Tehran: Tootia.
21. Hajiani, Ebrahim (2015). The methodological framework for environmental studies research. Strategic studies quarterly, 18(2), 8-36.
22. Hazeri, Ali Mohammad & Haji Hashemi, Marziyeh (2014). Understanding the components of religious fundamentalism in Iran with a local approach. Iranian journal of sociology, 15(2), 87-125.
23. Huntington, Samuel (1991). Political order in changing societies (Mohsen Solasi, translator). Tehran: Elm.
24. Inglehart, Ronald (1994). Cultural transformation in advanced industrial society (Maryam Vetr, translator). Tehran: Kavir.
25. Inglehart, Ronald (2003). Globalization and postmodern values (Iraj Feizi, translator). Letter of cultural research, 7(6), 109-128.
26. Jamshidi Rad, Mohammah Sadegh & Seyed Mohammad Reza, Mahmoodpanahi (2012). The concept of political Islam in Islamic revolution. Islamic revolution, 2(5), 127-149.
27. Kaviani Rad, Morad; Motaghi, Afshin; Zarghani, Seyed Hadi & Sadrania, Hasan (2019). Dentification and analysis of the variables and indicators affecting the strategic importance of the harirud for Iran with an approach of impact-interaction analysis. Applied researches in geographical sciences, 19(55), 1-22.
28. Keddie, Nikki. R (1998). Root of revolution (Abdorahim Gavahi, translator). Tehran: Ghalam.
29. Khan Mohammadi, yusof & khoramshad, Mohammad bagher (2021). The future of Shia Islam in Iran. Strategy, 30(98), 5-36.
30. Kohen, Bruce (2016). Introduction to sociology (Gholam Abbas Tavasoli & Reza Fazel, translators). Tehran: Samt.
31. Lakzaii, Mohammad; Ghasemi, Zahra & Navidnia, Manijeh (2020). Typology of social values in the public sphere. Cultural studies and communication, 17(62), 113-141. Doi: 10.22034/jcsc.2020.39792.
32. Marx, Karl & Engels, Friedrich (2007). The communist manifesto. In Leo Panitch & Colin Leys (Ed), the manifesto after 150 years (275-316) (Hasan Mortazavi, translator). Tehran: Agah.
33. Meidari, Ahmad (2005). An introduction to the theory of desirable governance. Social welfare quarterly, 6(22), 261-287.
34. Mohammad Ali, Tavana (2014). The paradigm of critical realism beyond positivism and hermeneutics: towards an interdisciplinary methodology. Interdisciplinary studies in the humanities, 7(1), 27-56.
35. Mohseni, Manouchehr (2007). A study in the cultural sociology of Iran. Tehran: Research center of culture, art and communications.
36. Moosavi, Mirtaher (2018). Social harms and inequality: the second report on the social situation in Iran (2009-2017). Tehran: Agah.
37. Mostaghimi, Bahram (1994). On the definition of crisis in the international system. Law and political science, 1137, 169-203.
38. Motaharnia, Mahdi (2020). Thesis of time, an introduction to future management. Tehran: Farabi.
39. Movasaghi Gilani, Seyed Ahmad (2014, January 27). Discussed in conversation with dr. Moussavi: the gap of discourse in Iran, from the constitutional revolution to the Islamic revolution. Khabar online, Iran analytical news agency https://www.khabaronline.ir. Https://www.khabaronline.ir/news/334884.
40. Naghibzade, Ahmad (2010). An introduction to political sociology. Tehran: Samt.
41. Outhwaite, William & Bottomore, Tom (2013). The Blackwell dictionary of twentieth-century social thought (Hasan Chavoshian, translator). Tehran: Ney.
42. Parkin, Frank (2005). Max Weber (Shahnaz Mosammaparast, translator). Tehran: Ghoghnoos.
43. Rafiepoor. Faramarz (1998). Development and contradiction: an effort towards the analysis of the Islamic revolution and social issues of Iran. Tehran: Sherkat Sahamiye Enteshar.
44. Rahbar, Farhad, Asl, Seifoddin, Shah Hoseini, Mohammad Ail & Niazi, Eesa (2018). Identification and analysis of macro trends affecting crude oil prices with a foresight approach. Improvement management, 12(2), 1-26.
45. Rush, Michael (2014). Politics and society: an introduction to political sociology (Manouchehr Sabouri, translator). Tehran: Samt.
46. Sabouri, Manouchehr (2002). Political sociology. Tehran: Sokhan.
47. Safari, Khadijeh & Kalani, Samayeh (2016). The lived experience of young people in facing identity challenges in a transitioning society (a qualitative study of 20-30-year-olds in the city of Isfahan). Iranian journal of social problems, 7(1), 99-124.
48. Sarshar, Mohammad; Salehi Amiri, Seyed Reza & Hajiani, Ebrahim (2022). Identification of the key drivers affecting the future of books in Iran. Social-cultural strategy, 11(2), 561-590.
49. Shaabani, Reza (2007). The fundaments of the social history of Iran. Tehran: Ghomes.
50. Taleban, Mohammad Reza; Mobasheri, Mohammad & Mehtaeen, Mostafa (2010). Examination of the trend of value transformation in Iran (1975-2009). Social sciences, 1(3), 23-63.
51. Vosoughi, Mansour & Akbari, Hosein (2010). Trends and factors influencing value changes; a comparative study. Social analysis, 4(59), 93-128.
52. Weber, Max (2018). Economy and society (Abbas Manouchehri, Mehrdad Torabi Nejad, & Mostafa Emadzade, translators). Tehran: Samt.
53. Welzel, Chris; Inglehart, Ronald & Klingman, Hanse-Dator (2003). Human development: a theory of social change (Hadi Jalili, translator). Tehran: National projects of the ministry of culture and Islamic guidance.
54. Wendell, Bell (2019). Foundations of foresight studies: history, objectives, and knowledge, human science for the new era (Mostafa Taghavi & Mohsen Mohaghegh, translators). Tehran: Educational and research institute of defense industries, Center for foresight studies of defense sciences and technologies.
55. Zeidabadi, Ahmad (2022, November 8). Ahmad zeidabadi's warning to raisi about the jebhe-ye paydari. News and analysis portal of ensaf news https://ensafnews.com. Http://www.ensafnews.com.
56. Zooelm, Ali (2005). A reflection on the concept of "challenge": the term "challenge" in Iranian socio-cultural literature. Zamaneh, 4(36), 34-37. Https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/81359.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
