شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (پاییز 1403) منتشر شد
Volume 12, Issue 2 (3-2022)
Social Problems of Iran 2022, 12(2): 239-258 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Movahedinia H, Boustani D, Moslemi Mehni Y. (2022). Underlying policy interference in education of Kerman province. Social Problems of Iran. 12(2), 239-258.
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3288-en.html
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3288-en.html
1- Department of Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Sociology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3- Department of Political Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran ,moslemi@uk.ac.ir
2- Department of Sociology, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran
3- Department of Political Science, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran ,
Abstract: (1615 Views)
The main purpose of this paper is to identify the facilitating beds of policy intervention in Kerman province education department. Research the method used in this study was based on field study and in-depth interview. The participants in this research included 35 teachers, principals and retired employees of Kerman province education department who were selected based on purposeful sampling method and sampling strategies with maximum variety as well as snowballs. Analysis of the qualitative findings has led to creation of 7 categories including: over-politicized province, teachers' social asset a fortune for the policy, ethnic and political influential combination, education department reserve army of policy field, party pertaining of religious and supervisory institutes, stage-director members of parliament, all-purpose policy. Analysis of the findings obtained from the categories coding revealed that three facilitating beds of casual conditions, ground conditions and intermediate conditions provided the ground of policy intervention in the education department.
The results obtained from analysis of these categories showed that the type of education structure, its needs and reciprocal dependence between the policy and education has created a bed that various political groups and various political institutes such as members of Islamic parliament, religious and supervisory institutes and other groups widely intervene in the content, organizational structure and deposition and appointment of the education directors. these interventions mostly seek party, group and personal desires.
The results obtained from analysis of these categories showed that the type of education structure, its needs and reciprocal dependence between the policy and education has created a bed that various political groups and various political institutes such as members of Islamic parliament, religious and supervisory institutes and other groups widely intervene in the content, organizational structure and deposition and appointment of the education directors. these interventions mostly seek party, group and personal desires.
Type of Article: Original Research |
Subject:
Political sociology
Received: 2021/09/1 | Accepted: 2021/11/28 | Published: 2022/03/1
Received: 2021/09/1 | Accepted: 2021/11/28 | Published: 2022/03/1
References
1. خانبان، زهرا (1395). سیاست فرهنگی حکومت محمدرضا شاه در آموزش و پرورش؛ پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه الزهرا، دانشکده ادبیات، زبان‌ها و تاریخ، گروه تاریخ.
2. رئیس پور، علی اکبر و فرقانی اوزرودی محمدباقر ، ۱۳۹۱، میزان اثربخشی مدرسه برتوسعه اخلاقی دانش آموزان، اولین کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت، نوآوری و تولید ملی،قم.
3. ساعی، علی؛ قاراخانی، معصومه؛ مؤمنی، فرشاد (1391). دولت و سیاست آموزش در ایران از سال 1360 تا 1388. فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی, دوره 19، شماره پیاپی 56: 166-117.
4. شرکاوری، محمد(1379)، درآمدی بر جامعه شناسی آموزش و پرورش، محمد جعفر پوینده، جلد اول ،تهران، نقش جهان.
5. شورای عالي انقلاب فرهنگ . (1390)سند تحول بنیادین آموزش: دبیرخانه شورای عالي انقلاب فرهنگي.
6. شیبانی، ملیحه؛ & موسوی، میر طاهر(1390). تحلیل وضعیت سرمایه اجتماعی در شهر کرمان، فصلنامه علمی، پژوهشی رفاه اجتماعی، دوره 11، شماره پیاپی 41: 122-93.
7. صبوری خسروشاهی, حبیب (1389). آموزش و پرورش در عصر جهانی شدن؛ چالش ها و راهبردهای مواجهه با آن. مطالعات راهبردی سیاستگذاری عمومی, دوره 1، شماره پیاپی 1:196-153.
8. کویره، الكساندر(1360)، سیاست از نظر افلاطون، ترجمه اميرحسين جهانبگلو، تهران: خوارزمي.
9. منافی شرف آباد، کاظم ؛ زمانی، الهام (1391)، نقش نظام آموزش و پرورش در توسعه فرهنگی جامعه، فصلنامه مهندسی فرهنگی، دوره 7، شماره 73: 152-134.
10. نوروززاده, مقدسی (1389). سیاستگذاری و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی در ایران با تأکید بر برنامۀ چهارم توسعه اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فرهنگی. نامه آموزش عالی, دوره 3، شماره پیاپی 11: 63-39.
11. Anyanwu, J., & Erhijakpor, A. E. (2007). Working Paper 92-Education Expenditures and School Enrolment in Africa: Illustrations from Nigeria and Other SANE Countries (No. 227).
12. Bokhari, F. A., Gai, Y., & Gottret, P. (2007). Government health expenditures and health outcomes. Health economics, volume 16(3), 257-273. [DOI:10.1002/hec.1157]
13. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory, Aldine Publishing Company. Chicago.
14. Patton, M. Q. (1994). How to Use Qualitative Methods in Evaluation. London: Sage.
15. Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory: Procedures and Technique. (2nd Edition); Sage, Newbury Park, London.
16. Ruth, D (2017). Education as busines destructive policy, based on badeconomics: https://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/aboutmassey/news/article.cfm?mnarticle_uuid=A0AC0990-9226-8463-67A7-483FB3D4C637.
17. UKEssays. (November 2018). Government Intervention in Education and the Environment.Retrieved from https://www.ukessays.com/essays/ politics/government-intervention-education- 5310.php?vref=1
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
