شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (زمستان 1403) منتشر شد
Volume 13, Issue 1 (9-2022)
Social Problems of Iran 2022, 13(1): 31-48 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hajizadeh Meimandi M, Khani A, Maroufi M, Karimi R. (2022). Understanding and interpreting of work from the perspective of Kurdish workers living in Yazd (Based on grounded theory). Social Problems of Iran. 13(1), 31-48.
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3221-en.html
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3221-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Yazd University
2- PhD student in economic sociology and development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University ,khani.asaad@gmail.com
3- M.A, social welfare planning, Allameh Tabatabai University
4- M.A, Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan
2- PhD student in economic sociology and development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University ,
3- M.A, social welfare planning, Allameh Tabatabai University
4- M.A, Urban Planning, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan
Abstract: (1350 Views)
Regardless of the type of work; Looking at work, understanding and interpreting it, and the mindset that is formed around this social construction, is somehow effective in creating, promoting and developing motivations and tendencies to work, and affects people's actions and consequently their efficiency. The purpose of this research is to understand and interpret of work from the perspective of Kurdish workers living in Yazd. For this purpose, after interviewing 30 workers and reaching theoretical richness, the text of the interviews was implemented and important categories were extracted by using the grounded theory, and after interpreting the categories, a paradigm model was presented. The findings indicate the classification of the participants in two dominant spectrums: This means that some of them looked at the issue of working with a positive view, for them, work was the manifestation of agency, also, this group of people considered work to be exciting and tried to be loyal to their work as much as possible, and despite some structural limitations, solutions such as accepting a new position and changing their mentality have been their tactics to overcome challenges. But on the other side of the spectrum and with the predominance of negative views, work has been introduced as the destroyer of human creativity and identity, and also it has been represented in connection with social determinism. In fact, according to the statements of the latter category, work is a place where agency is limited and man suffers from self-alienation; That's why these people consider work boring and use every opportunity to violate their commitment at work. These two types of views on work at a more general and macro level shape the work culture and come to the fore in the society, of course, this relationship is not one-way and the work culture of any society can shape the way people's look at work.
Keywords: work culture, Work conscience, Commitment and perseverance, Alienation from work, Kurdish workers living in Yazd.
Type of Article: Original Research |
Received: 2020/07/28 | Accepted: 2021/09/15 | Published: 2022/09/18
Received: 2020/07/28 | Accepted: 2021/09/15 | Published: 2022/09/18
References
1. احمدرش، رشید (1397). دیالکتیک مرز و توسعه: تحلیل جامعه‌شناختی دشواری‌های توسعهٔ پایدار در مناطق مرزی غرب کشور. فصلنامهٔ توسعهٔ محلی (روستایی- شهری)، دورهٔ 10، شمارهٔ 2: 206- 183.
2. انتظاری، علی؛ کرمانی، محسن (1394). تبیین عوامل اجتماعی و فردی مؤثر بر فرهنگ کار (مورد مطالعه، کارکنان صنایع شهرستان کاشان). فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شوشتر، سال 9، شماره 2، پیاپی (29): 54- 29.
3. بک، الریش (1395). جامعه‌شناسی کار: دنیای شگفت‌انگیز کار در مدرنیته بازاندیشانه. ترجمه: سعید صادقی‌جقه و آیت نباتی‌حصارلو. تهران: جامعه شناسان.
4. بیتا، حامد (1388). عوامل اجتماعی مرتبط با نگرش جوانان به کار (مطالعه موردی: جوانان 18- 26 ساله شهر کرمانشاه). پژوهش جوانان فرهنگ و جامعه، شماره 2: 97- 77.
5. حاجی‌زاده میمندی، مسعود (1372). آشنایی با جامعه‌شناسی کار. فصلنامه کار و جامعه، شماره 2: 42- 36.
6. حجازی، مسعود؛ تقی‌پور فرشی، فریبا (1394). بررسی تأثیر شادی در کار بر بهره‌وری نیروی انسانی. مدیریت بهره‌وری، سال 9، شماره 33: 92- 77.
7. رعنایی کردشولی، حبیب‌الله؛ علی‌محمدلو، مسلم؛ جاجرمی‌زاده، محسن؛ عباسی، عباس و الهیاری بوزنجانی، احمد (1395). چارچوبی برای ارزیابی و تحلیل وضعیت ویژگی‌های فرهنگ کار. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی مطالعات مدیریت، سال 25، شماره 81: 56- 25.
8. زندی‌پور، طیبه (1384). آسیب‌شناسی فرهنگ و اخلاق کار. پژوهش‌های مشاوره، سال 25، دوره 4، شماره 16: 62- 47.
9. طیبی ابوالحسنی، سیدامیرحسین؛ خدابخشی، محمد و عزیزیان کلخوران، زهرا (1398). عوامل مؤثر بر نگرش اخلاقی به کسب‌وکار مورد مطالعه: دانشجویان دختر دانشگاه شهید بهشتی. جامعه‌شناسی کاربردی، دوره 30، شماره 4: 175- 151.
10. کرسول، جان (1396). پویش کیفی و طرح پژوهش. ترجمه: دانایی‌فرد، حسن، تهران: صفّار.
11. محمدی اصل، عباس (1392). جامعه‌شناسی کار و مدیریت صنعتی. تهران: گل‌آذین.
12. معیدفر، سعید (1378). فرهنگ و اخلاق کار در ایران. فصلنامه کار و جامعه، شماره 42: 40- 34.
13. معیدفر، سعید (1386). اخلاق کار به‌عنوان یک مسئله اجتماعی. ماهنامه مهندسی فرهنگی، سال 2، شماره 14: 18- 6.
14. نوذری، حمزه (1396). تحلیل تجربه و درک کارگران از شرایط کاری: دلایل و پیامدها (مورد مطالعه: کارگران بنگاه‌های تولیدی پوشاک کرج). برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، دوره 8، شماره 31: 262- 231.
15. نهاوندی، مریم؛ مقدم اصیل، مریم (1397). بررسی تطبیقی عوامل مؤثر بر فرهنگ کار در ایران و چهار کشور آسیایی. فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، سال 27، شماره 81: 209- 171.
16. Anuradha, M. V. Srinivas, E. S. Singhal, M. Ramnarayan, S. (2014). To Work or Not to Work: Construction of Meaning of Work and Making Work Choice. Vikalpa, Vol, 39(2), 7- 20. [DOI:10.1177/0256090920140203]
17. Ardichvili, A. Kuchinke, K. P. (2009). International Perspectives on the Meanings of Work and Working: Current Research and Theory. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11 (2), 155-167. [DOI:10.1177/1523422309333494]
18. Budd, J. W. & Spencer, D. A. (2015). Worker well-being and the importance of work: Bridging the gap", European Journal of Industrial Relations. 21(2),181 -196. [DOI:10.1177/0959680114535312]
19. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. London: Sage.
20. Deranty, J. P. (2009). What is Work? Key Insight from the Psychodynamics of Work. London: Sage. [DOI:10.1177/0725513609105484]
21. Forens, S. L. Rocco, T. S. Wollard, K. K. (2004). Workplace Commitment: A Conceptual Model Developed From Integrative Review of the Research. Human Resource Development Review, 7 (3), 339-357. [DOI:10.1177/1534484308318760]
22. Harju, L. Hakanen, J. J. Schaufeli, W. B. (2014). Job Boredom and Its Correlates in 87 Finnish Organizations. JOEM, 56 (9), 911- 918. [DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000248]
23. Judge, T. A & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012). Job Attitudes. The Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 341-67. [DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511]
24. Necoranec, J. KmoŠena, M. (2015). Stress in the Workplace Sources, Effects and Coping Strategies. Review of the Air Force Academy, 1 (28), 162- 170.
25. Rosengren, C. (2015). Performing work: The drama of everyday working life. Time & Society, 0(0),1-21, Sage.Co.UK/Journals, Permissions, nav. DOI: 10.1177/0961463X15620983. [DOI:10.1177/0961463X15620983]
26. Rotenberry, P. F. Moberg, P. j. (2007). Assessing the impact of job involvement on performance. Management Research News, 30(3), 203- 215. [DOI:10.1108/01409170710733278]
27. Srirangarajan, G. S & Kumar Bhaskar, R. (2011). Key Dimensions of Spirit at Work-An Indian Perspective. Journal of Human Values, 17(2), 93-120. [DOI:10.1177/097168581101700201]
28. Strauss, A. L, & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
29. Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory. Procedures and Techniques,Sage.
30. Woodside, M. Gibbons, M. M. Davidson, J. Hannon, C. Sweeney, J. (2012). Work and Career Experiences of Men from Families without College Experience. The Qualitative Report,17(27), 1-16.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
