شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (تابستان 1403) منتشر شد
Volume 12, Issue 2 (3-2022)
Social Problems of Iran 2022, 12(2): 85-114 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khosravi A. (2022). Corona, the Test of neo-Marxism in the Minimal Condition of the natione- state of Contemporary Iran. Social Problems of Iran. 12(2), 85-114.
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3373-en.html
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3373-en.html
PhD in Sociology. University of Isfahan , khosravia89@yahoo.com
Abstract: (1511 Views)
The research program of Agamben, the famous philosopher of neo-marxism, exposes the anarchic nature of law as an apparatus for gaining power. This apparatus is used in State of exception through the suspension of the law. Contrary to the government's claim, what provides the ontological basis for the suspension of the law is not the violation of the law, but the originality of the law. Agamben attacks it. It even negates the national state in implicit implications. This negation expresses the ideal of the universal unity of communism. However the historical coordinates of contemporary Iran are: lack of national state, lack of law, projection (conspiracy theory), and political-economic populism. Given these coordinates, a reflexivity of Agamben's theoretical apparatus from a local perspective is necessary. In a statement, Agamben called health protocols in the age of the corona pandemic useless and conspiratorial, in other words, he called us to violate the relevant laws. His remarks confirm the need to consciously confront the views of neo-Marxism in Iran. Accordingly, the present article, with a brief essay on juridical identity, typical identity, and the playing identity of the modern state in Iran, reminds us of the need for indigenous attention to the theories of neo-Marxism. The findings of this analytical article show that the identity of the modern state in Iran is bureaucratic, undemocratic, and antagonistic. Therefore, what has provided the ontological origin of the suspension of law in Iran is not the originality and legitimacy of the law. origin of the suspension of the law in Iran are: the political metaphysics of illegality, the originality of the charisma of the ruling person, the originality of anti-colonialism, the originality of anti-imperialism and global capitalism, the originality of a particular reading from religion.
Type of Article: Original Research |
Subject:
Political sociology
Received: 2021/06/17 | Accepted: 2022/01/18 | Published: 2022/03/1
Received: 2021/06/17 | Accepted: 2022/01/18 | Published: 2022/03/1
References
1. آگامبن، جورجو(۱۳95). وسایل بی‌هدف. ترجمه امید مهرگان و صالح نجفی. تهران:رخداد¬نو.
2. آگامبن، جورجو(۱۳۸۹). اجتماع آینده. ترجمه محمدرضا قربانی. تهران:رخدادِنو.
3. آگامبن،جورجو. (۱۳95). وضعیت استثنایی. ترجمه پویا ایمانی. تهران:نی.
4. آگامبن، جورجو(1400). آفرینش و آنارشی. ترجمه هومن کاسبی. تهران: درنگ¬ها.
5. بشیریه، حسین(1375). ایدئولوژی و فرهنگ سیاسی گروه های حاکم در دوران پهلوی. نقدونظر،سال سوم،شماره7: 85-74.
6. بشیریه، حسین(1383). ایدئولوژی سیاسی و هویت اجتماعی در ایران. ناقد،سال دهم. شماره2: 29-13.
7. جهانبگلو، رامین(1381). موج چهارم، تهران:نی.
8. داوری¬اردکانی، رضا(1379). درباره غرب،تهران: هرمس.
9. سانتاگ، سوزان (1395). بیماری به¬مثابه استعاره، ترجمه احسان کیانی¬خواه،تهران:حرفه نویسنده.
10. سروش، عبدالکریم(1370). در رازدانی روشنفکری و دین‌داری، تهران:صراط.
11. شایگان، داریوش (1380). افسون¬زدگی جدید. ترجمه فاطمه ¬ولیانی. تهران: فرزان روز.
12. عاقلی، باقر(1370). نخست وزیران ایران. تهران:جاویدان.
13. فوکو، میشل(1398). دیرینه شناسی دانش. ترجمه نیکو سرخوش و افشین جهاندیده. تهران: نی.
14. فینک، بروس(1397). سوژه لکانی میان زبان و ژوئیسانس. ترجمه علی حسن¬زاده. تهران: بان.
15. کاتوزیان، محمدعلی¬همایون (1379). دولت و جامعه در ایران. ترجمه حسن¬افشار. تهران: مرکز.
16. Agamben, G. (1993). The Coming Community (M. Hardt, Trans.). University Of Minnesota Press. (Original work published ca. 1992)
17. Agamben, G. (2005). State of Exception (K. Attell, Trans). University Of Chicago Press. (Original work published ju. 2004) [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226009261.001.0001]
18. Agamben, G. (2012, March24). Gesture, or the Structure of Art. YouTube Video. https://www.you tube.com/watch.v=v4bKAEz3TF0.
19. Agamben, G. (2020). When the House Burns Down. Translated by Kevin attell. Diacritics journal.com
20. Agamben, G. (2020, February 26). The state of exception provoked by an unmotivated emergency. Positions Politics. http://positionspolitics.org/giorgio-agamben-the-state-of-exception-
21. provoked-by-an-unmotivated-emergency.
22. Agamben, G. (2020, March11). Contagio.Quodlibet. https://www.quodlibet.it/giorgio-agamben-contagio.
23. Agamben, G. (2020, May3). The Enemy Is Not Outside It Is Within Us. Bookhaven. https://bookhaven.stanford.edu/2020/03/giorgio-agamben-on-coronavirus-the-enemyis-not-outside-it-is-within-us.
24. Badiou, A. (2020, August12). On the Epidemic Situation. Verso books. https://www.Verso books.com/blogs/4608-on-the-epidemic-situation
25. Benvenuto, S. (2020, May 8). Forget about Agamben. Professores. Http://www.Professores. uff.br/ricardobasbaum/wpcontent/uploads/sites/164/2020/04/Philo_Coronavirus-and-philosophers-European- Journal-of-Psychoanalysis.pdf.
26. Chiesa, L & Ruda, F. (2011) The Event of Language as Force of Life; agamben's linguistic vitalism. The Theoretical Humanities. 22 (4), pp163-180. https://www.Published online/Journal of the Theoretical Humanities. [DOI:10.1080/0969725X.2011.621233]
27. Christiaens, T. (2020, March26). Must Society be defended from Agamben? Criticallegalthinking. https://www.criticallegalthinking.com/2020/03/26/must-society-be-defended-from-agamben.
28. Comanducci, C. (2017, March 10). EmptyGesture. Sapparatus journal. Https://net /index.
29. php/apparatus/article/view/56/128 Gestures apparatus journal
30. Gonzalo. P. Q (2001). Foreign Policy in Constructed World. Routledge Press.
31. Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. The MIT . 23(3), pp. 171-200. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2539267 [DOI:10.1162/isec.23.1.171]
32. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of Horror. (L. Roudiez, Trans). University Of Columbia Peess.
33. Morgenthau, H. (1948). Politics among Nations. Mcgraw Press.
34. Pouliot, V. (2004). The Essence of Constructivism.International Relations and Development. 7 (3), PP319-336. https://www.research gate.Net/publication /233659803_The_Essence_of_Constructivism. [DOI:10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800022]
35. Smith, S. (2001). Foreign Policyis What States Make of it? International Relations. 10(2),PP1735. https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/1552662/mod_resource/content/1/Reinvigorating%20the%20Study%20of%20Foreign%20Policy%20Construtivism.pdf
36. Zizek, S. (2020, April 15). Barbarism with a Human Face. literarischewelt. https://www. welt.de/kultur/literarischewelt/article206829259/Slavoj-Zizek-on-Corona-Barbarismwith-
37. a-Human-Face.html.
38. Zizek. S. (2020, Apri l6). The End of the World As We Know It. Kultur. https://www. welt. de/kultur/article206269547/Corona-Epidemic-The-End-of-the-World-As-We-Know-It.html.
39. Zizek. S. (2020, March 16). Monitor And Punish? Yes, Please. The Philosophical Salon.https://www.the philosophical salon.com/monitor-and-punish-yes-please.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
