Brahmanandam, S. (2020). Ghostwriting and the invisible academic labour in South Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(2), 264–281.
بوردیو، پییر (1402)، تمایز؛ نقد اجتماعی قضاوتهای ذهنی، ترجمه حسن پاوشیان، تهران: نشر ثالث.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing Grounded Theory. Sage.
کلاته ساداتی، احمد، صادقیه، سارا و باقری لنکرانی، کامران (1403)، مطالعهای کیفی بر موضوع «عدالت» در آموزش پزشکی در ایران، جامعه شناسی کاربردی، سال ۳۵، شماره ۱ (پیاپی ۹۳)، صص 31-52.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage.
گلستانی، مجتبی (1396)، بازخوانی نظریه میشل فوکو درباره مرگ و کارکرد مولف و نسبت آن با سرقت ادبی، فصلنامه کیمیای هنر، جلد 6، شماره 23، صص 57-68.
Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. Proceedings of the 2nd International Plagiarism: Prevention, Practice and Policy Conference, Newcastle, UK.
کاظمی، عباس (1394)، پرولتاریای دانشگاهی جدید، اندیشه پویا، شمارۀ 56 ،آذر و دیماه.
Flaherty, D. K. (2013). Ghost‑ and guest‑authored pharmaceutical industry–sponsored studies: Abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 47(7–8), 937–946.
کاظمی، عباس (1395)، پرولتاریای دانشگاهی در ایران«، مرکز دایرهالمعارف بزرگ اسلامی، 10 مرداد 1395 .130333/news/fa/ir.org.cgie://h
Healy, D., & Cattell, D. (2003). Interface between authorship, industry and science in the domain of therapeutics. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 183, 22–27.
جمشیدیها، غلامرضا و پرستش، شهرام (1386)، دیالکتیک منش و میدان در نظریه عمل پییر بوردیو، نامه علوم اجتماعی، شماره 30، صص 1-32.
Kazemi, A. V., & Dehnavi, A. D. (2017). The new academic proletariat in Iran. Critique, 45(1–2), 141–158.
محمدی فردین، خالق پناه کمال، نوغانی دخت بهمنی، محسن و کرمانی، مهدی (1398)، تکوین تکثر تمایز در میدان، عادت واره و سرمایه: صورتبندی نظریه توسعه از دیدگاه بوردیو، توسعه اجتماعی، دوره 13، شماره 4، صص 55-90.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664-670.
طاهری، خ.، رضایی، س.، و معینی، م. (۱۳۹۸). مطالعهای جامعهشناختی درباره بازار پایاننامهنویسی در ایران. پژوهشنامه آموزش عالی، ۱۰(۴)، ۱۱۵–۱۴۰.
Zimring, F. E., & Hawkins, G. J. (1973). Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. University of Chicago Press.
علینیا، م.، و شریفی، ن. (۱۴۰۰). نگاهی مردمنگارانه به تجربه پایاننامهنویسان در تهران: بازاریشدن دانش و حذف نمادین نویسنده. مطالعات فرهنگی و ارتباطات، ۱۷(۲)، ۵۹–۸۳.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1969). The prediction of behavior intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5(4), 400-416.
Bandura, A (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. Springer-Verlag.
Fletcher, J. (1966). Situational ethics. Westminster Press.
Lacasse, J. R., & Leo, J. (2010). Why does academic medicine allow ghostwriting: A prescription for reform. Society, 47(5), 398–402.
Lancaster, T., & Clarke, R. (2016). Contract cheating: The outsourcing of assessed student work. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 639–654). Springer.
Maddi, A., & Teixeira Da Silva, J. (2025, April 8). Beyond authorship: Analyzing contributions in PLOS ONE and the challenges of appropriate attribution. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06314
Panter, M. (2025, March 20). Ghost Authorship. AJE Blog. https://blog.aje.com/en/ghost-authorship
Porter, S. J., & McIntosh, L. D. (2024, January 8). Identifying Fabricated Networks within Authorship‑for‑Sale Enterprises. arXiv.
Rose, S. L., Bosch, R. J., & Schmidt, C. (2008). Ghost authorship in industry-initiated randomized clinical trials. PLOS Medicine, 5(1), e19.
Sismondo, S. (2007). Ghost management: How much of the medical literature is shaped behind the scenes by the pharmaceutical industry? PLoS Medicine, 4(9), e286.
Stretton, J. (2014). Systematic review of ghostwriting prevalence in biomedical literature. Medical Writing, 23(1), 25–31.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded Theory Methodology.
Refrences in Persian
Alinia, Mohammad, & Sharifi, Nasrin. (2021). An ethnographic look at the experiences of thesis writers in Tehran: The commodification of knowledge and the symbolic exclusion of the author. Cultural and Communication Studies, 17(2), 59–83.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (2023). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (Translated by Hassan Pavoshian). Tehran: Sales.
Golestani, Mojtaba. (2017). A reconsideration of Michel Foucault’s theory of the death and function of the author and its relation to plagiarism. Kimia-ye Honar Quarterly, 6(23), 57–68.
Hemmati, Reza, & Baharlouei, Maryam. (2025). A qualitative analysis of students’ experiences of thesis outsourcing. Iranian Journal of Social Issues, 16(1), 265–306.
Hemmati, Reza, & Baharlouei, Maryam. (2025). Rebellion against the university: A qualitative analysis of the experience of ghostwriting theses in Iran. Strategic Research on Social Problems, 14(2), 23–46.
Jamsheediha, Gholamreza, & Parastesh, Shahram. (2007). The dialectic of habitus and field in Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Social Sciences Letter, (30), 1–32.
Kazemi, Abbas. (2016, July 31). The academic proletariat in Iran. Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://www.cgie.org.ir/fa/news/130333
Kazemi, Abbas, & Asghari, Zahra. (2019). An examination of the phenomenon of thesis writing in Iran: Policies and conditions of possibility. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 25(4), 1–22.
Kalateh Sadati, Ahmad, Sadeghieh, Sara, & Bagheri Lankarani, Kamran. (2024). A qualitative study on the concept of “justice” in medical education in Iran. Applied Sociology, 93(1), 31–52.
Mohammadi Fardin, Khalegh Panah Kamal, Noughani Dokht Bahmani, Mohsen, & Kermani, Mehdi. (2019). The formation of plural distinctions in field, habitus, and capital: The theoretical formulation of development from Bourdieu’s perspective. Social Development, 13(4), 55–90.
Rasouli, Behrouz, Nabi Meybodi, Morteza, Mokhtari, Hamidreza, Nabavi, Majid, Nazari, Maryam, & Alidousti, Sirus. (2020). Conceptualizing ghostwriting: A look at scientific misconduct in the context of Iranian higher education. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 54(4), 13–36.
Salehabadi, Zahra, Seyedzadeh Sani, Seyed Mehdi, & Javan Jafari Bojnordi, Abdolreza. (2022). Comparative study of ghostwriting in Iranian and United States criminal law. Comparative Law, 18(2), 37–62.
Salehabadi, Zahra, Seyedzadeh Sani, Seyed Mehdi, & Javan Jafari Bojnordi, Abdolreza. (2022). Reconsidering ghostwriting as distinct from plagiarism: Concept, types, and legal approaches. Library and Information Research Journal, 12(1), 59–75.
Taheri, Khadijeh, Rezaei, Saeid, & Moeini, Mohammad. (2019). A sociological study of the thesis market in Iran. Journal of Higher Education Studies, 10(4), 115–140.
Tasnim News Agency. (2016, May 25). Buying a thesis in just a few minutes. Retrieved from https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1395/03/05/1083836
Mehr News Agency. (2025, January 20). Underground research reaches professors’ emails; write an article and receive 200 million tomans. Retrieved from https://www.mehrnews.com/news/6351344
Mashregh News. (2018, May 26). A report on the sale of academic degrees on Enghelab Street. Retrieved from https://www.mashreghnews.ir/news/858880
Shokramiz, Amineh. (2021). “Doctors” who sell theses on Enghelab Street. Ensaf News. Retrieved from https://ensafnews.com/312927/
