Social Problems of Iran

Qualitative Analysis of Students' Experiences with Outsourcing Thesis Writing

Authors

Reza Hemmati 1
Maryam Baharlouei 2

1 Associate Professor of Sociology, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 PhD in Sociology, Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

https://doi.org/10.61186/jspi.16.1.265
Abstract
Dissertation outsourcing, a severe form of contract cheating and ghostwriting, poses a significant threat to academic integrity and the credibility of higher education both in Iran and globally. This issue has intensified over recent decades with the growth of the black market for dissertation writing in Iran, underscoring the need to explore its underlying motives. This qualitative study employed thematic analysis to investigate the experiences of 13 master's degree students from Isfahan universities who had entirely outsourced their dissertations. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Brown and Clarke's (2012) six-step approach. The findings were distilled into six main themes: “Meaningless thesis,” “Challenging daily life,” “Culture of cheating,” “Communication disorder,” “Learning challenges,” and “Decline of scientific values.” The results revealed that outsourcing stems from a complex interplay of individual factors (e.g., financial difficulties, inadequate research skills) and environmental factors (e.g., weak academic supervision, commodification of education). Unlike previous studies that concentrated on structural factors, this research delved into the lived experiences of students within the socio-cultural context of Iran using a qualitative approach, highlighting the influence of teacher-student relationships and the culture of cheating. The findings underscore the necessity to redefine the role of the thesis, enhance supervision, and instill scientific ethics to prevent such fraud. This study contributes to educational policy-making aimed at combating ghostwriting and lays the groundwork for future research on the role of technology and gender differences.



Extended Abstract

1. Introduction

Research constitutes a fundamental component of universities and higher education institutions, with postgraduate programs playing a pivotal role in this field. The primary indicator of research within postgraduate education and the most significant scholarly endeavor for students across all disciplines is the dissertation. A dissertation is a comprehensive report detailing the resolution of a research question or problem that a scholar has undertaken and completed (Shelby, 1990). The process of writing a dissertation is a critical milestone for graduate students, as it encapsulates all the knowledge acquired throughout their academic tenure. Despite the dissertation’s indisputable significance, recent decades have witnessed the emergence of contract cheating—encompassing ghostwriting and outsourcing—as a recognized international issue and formidable challenge to academic integrity. This phenomenon has been exacerbated by transformations in university education systems, including massification, privatization, monetization, internationalization, and increased integration of technology (York et al., 2022). Numerous studies have documented the adverse effects of contract cheating on students and universities. Consequently, rigorous scientific investigations into dissertation outsourcing are imperative. The central research question of this study is as follows: What motivates master's degree graduates to outsource dissertation writing and engage in contract cheating?



2. Methodology

This study was conducted using a qualitative approach. Qualitative research focuses on developing a deeper understanding of complex phenomena that can be difficult to measure empirically (Johnson & Waterfield, 2004; Walsh et al., 2020). Participants were purposively sampled. The participants in this study were 13 students in master ’sand doctoral programs at universities and higher education institutions in the country who had outsourced their dissertation writing. Data were collected through in-person and online semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain responses. This semi-structured approach allows to one the one hand having key questions that define the specific areas that are discussed, on the other hand the chance to get more detailed responses by diverging. It also allows the interviewer to collect valuable information that was not considered in the discussed context (Gill et al., 2008). The interviewer tried to conduct the interviews in a safe, comfortable, and quiet place to obtain the most important information without any noise. The interviews began with general questions and then more specific and relevant questions were asked to get the most important information. Each interview lasted approximately 60 to 90 minutes. All participants provided informed consent. In addition, all information, scripts, and recordings were kept completely confidential by the researchers. The identities of the participants were not disclosed, and aliases were used to comply with the privacy principle. All participants were assured of the confidentiality and anonymity of their information by using pseudonyms in published reports.



3. Findings

The findings were distilled into six main themes: “Meaninglessness of dissertation,” “Challenging daily life,” “Culture of cheating,” “Communication disorder,” “Learning challenges,” and “Decline of scientific values.” The results revealed that outsourcing stems from a complex interplay of individual factors (e.g., financial difficulties, inadequate research skills) and environmental factors (e.g., weak academic supervision, commodification of education). Unlike previous studies that concentrated on structural factors, this research delved into the lived experiences of students within the socio-cultural context of Iran using a qualitative approach, highlighting the influence of teacher-student relationships and the culture of cheating.



4. Conclusion

Students often choose to outsource their dissertation because of their perception of its purpose. Rather than seeing the dissertation as a chance for educational, scientific, research, and career advancement, many students regard it as an insignificant task that lacks real value. Participants noted that writing a dissertation does not equip them for the job market, enhance their knowledge or skills, and, more importantly, their findings are not utilized and, as they put it, merely "gather dust in the library corner."

Another reason for outsourcing is the various challenges that students encounter in their daily lives. Some students face numerous issues, such as health problems, mental health challenges, and financial difficulties, or have numerous commitments, such as marriage, employment, and various work duties, which leave them with insufficient time to write a dissertation, even if they possess the necessary research skills. For these individuals, outsourcing is a strategy for managing their lives. In such situations, engaging in scientific discourse becomes irrelevant to students. Furthermore, the prospect of engaging in scientific work and producing a strong dissertation is uncertain and not guaranteed, and the cost of crafting a high-quality dissertation is significantly higher than working and other responsibilities, making dissertation writing seem unreasonable and illogical. The situation becomes even more complex when marriage is combined with employment. Naturally, this scenario has different implications for men and women.

One contributing factor to the outsourcing of dissertation work is the breakdown in communication between students and their professors. The supervisor’s role can significantly influence this decision in several ways. First, limited access to the supervisor and the inability to receive necessary feedback and support, often due to the supervisor's heavy workload and numerous administrative responsibilities, can prompt students to seek external assistance to complete their work more efficiently and accurately. Additionally, certain behaviours exhibited by professors, such as excessive strictness or lack of expertise in the relevant field, may drive students to outsource their work. Such professors may inadvertently or deliberately contribute to this trend through their unavailability and lack of effective guidance. Overall, factors such as inadequate follow-up on student progress, insufficient support, delays in providing feedback, lack of timely guidance, poor collaboration, and the provision of confusing or unhelpful feedback were cited by participants as justifications for outsourcing dissertation.

The prevalence of academic dishonesty is a significant factor contributing to students' propensity to outsource their work. From the students' perspective, there appears to be a lack of stringent oversight and regulation concerning the dissertation writing and defence process. Even when violations are identified, there is an absence of serious, public, or rigorous consequences for either the student or the professor, leading to the perception that such infractions are inconsequential. According to the participants, outsourcing dissertation work is not only uncondemned at their university but is also perceived as a normative and widespread practice among students. Consequently, students not only engage in this behaviour but also advocate it to their peers. Another factor influencing students' inclination to outsource, as perceived by participants, is the diminishing value placed on academic integrity and the transformation of universities into profit-driven entities. This shift is attributed to the increasing emphasis on revenue generation at any cost. In this context, universities regard students as customers, akin to commodities and sources of income, and strive to satisfy them by adhering to minimal standards, often at the expense of quality of education. Conversely, students, recognizing this dynamic, focus primarily on obtaining grades and certificates rather than on genuine learning and knowledge acquisition.

In general, preventing dissertation ghost writing, poses greater challenges than other forms of academic dishonesty and unethical behaviour, as conventional methods are insufficient for its detection. Nonetheless, certain measures can be implemented to mitigate the demand for outsourced dissertation writing services.

Keywords

Dissertation outsourcing
Contract cheating
Ghostwriting
Qualitative Inquiry
Ahsan, K., Akbar, S., & Kam, B. (2022). Contract cheating in higher education: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 523-539.
ابراهیمی، سعید، اعتصامی، سیدمصطفی، صدیقی، محمود، متواضع، محسن، نصری، اعظم، یدالهی‌خالص، الهه و یوسفی همدانی، الهام (۱۴۰۲). آمارنامه شهر اصفهان ۱۴۰۲، شهرداری اصفهان. معاونت برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه سرمایه انسانی، گروه آمار و تحلیل اطلاعات. قابل‌دسترس از https://plan.isfahan.ir/sites/isfct/files/field_content_file/statistics_seasons_tag/1402-01.pdf
Ajzen, I. (1969). The prediction of behavior intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5(4), 400-416.
اجاقی، رضوان، کیوان‌آرا، محمود، چشمه‌سهرابی، مظفر و پاپی، احمد (۱۳۹۰). تحلیل آسیب‌شناسی تقلب و سرقت علمی: بر اساس یک تحقیق کیفی. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی. ویژه‌نامه توسعه آموزش و ارتقای سلامت، ۱۱، ۱۰۷۳-۱۰۶۳.
Ali, H. I. H., & Alhassan, A. (2021). Fighting contract cheating and ghostwriting in Higher Education: Moving towards a multidimensional approach. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-18.
توکل، محمد و ناصری‌راد، محسن (۱۳۸۸). دستبرد علمی با تبیینی از جامعه‌شناسی علم، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، ۳ و ۴، ۱۶-۱.
Ataei-Ashtiani, B. (2016). Curbing Iran’s Academic Misconduct. Science, 351(6279), 1273–1274.
دهقانی، غلامعلی (۱۳۸۶). رضایتمندی دانشجویان دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تبریز از سرپرستی پایان‌نامه. مجله ایرانی آموزش در علوم پزشکی. ۹(۴)، ۳۰۹-۳۰۲.
Awdry, R., & Ives, B. (2023). International predictors of contract cheating in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 193-212.
رستمی، فرحناز، زرافشانی، کیومرث، سعدوندی، مهسا و حسینی لرگانی، مریم. (۱۳۹۲). تعیین مؤلفه‌های تأثیرگذار بر بروز رفتارهای مغایر رفتار علمی در آموزش عالی (مطالعه موردی دانشجویان پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه رازی). فصلنامه انجمن آموزش عالی ایران، ۵(۳)، ۱۶۳-۱۴۳.
Awdry, R., & Newton, P. M. (2019). Staff views on commercial contract cheating in higher education: a survey study in Australia and the UK. Higher Education, 78, 593-610.
رسولی، بهروز، نبی‌میبدی، مرتضی، مختاری، حمیدرضا، نبوی، مجید، نظری، مریم و علیدوستی، سیروس (۱۳۹۹). مفهوم‌سازی سایه‌نویسی: نگاهی به بدرفتاری‌های علمی در بافت آموزش عالی ایران. تحقیقات کتابداری و اطلاع‌رسانی دانشگاهی، ۵۴(۴)، ۳۶-۱۳.
Bandura, Albert (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
عطاران، محمد، زین‌آبادی، حسن‌رضا و طولابی، سعید (۱۳۸۹). انتخاب استاد راهنما و رابطه استاد راهنما - دانشجو دیدگاه‌های دانش‌آموختگان دوره دکترا. مجله مطالعات برنامه درسی، ۱۶، ۱۲۹-۹۶.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
علیوردی‌نیا، اکبر، جانعلیزاده، حیدر و عمرانی دهکهان، سجاد (۱۳۹۴). بررسی نقش یادگیری اجتماعی در تقلب دانشگاهی. مسائل اجتماعی ایران، ۶(۲)، ۱۰۳-۷۱.
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., & van Haeringen, K. (2019a). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in higher education, 44(11), 1837-1856.
علیوردی‌نیا، اکبر و صالح‌نژاد، صالح (۱۳۹۲). بررسی عوامل مؤثر در اقدام به تقلب دانشجویان، فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فناوری، ۱، ۹۳-۸۵
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Rundle, K., Newton, P. M., Ellis, C., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019b). Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
کاظمی، عباس (۱۳۹۷) دانشگاه: از سایه‌بان تا نردبان. پژوهشکده مطالعات اجتماعی و فرهنگی وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری.
Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. In Proceedings of 2nd International Plagiarism Conference.
کاظمی، عباس و اصغری، زهرا (۱۳۹۸). نگاهی به پدیده پایان‌نامه‌نویسی در ایران: سیاست‌گذاری‌ها و زمینه‌های امکان. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی، (۲۵)4، ۲۲-۱.
Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006, June). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. In Proceedings of 2nd international plagiarism conference (pp. 19-21).
نپ، جان ‌سی و هولبرت، آزالیا ام. (۱۳۹۸). سایه‌نویسی و اخلاق اصالت (احسان شاه‌قاسمی، مترجم). تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی.
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
همتی، رضا، کریمی، مریم و زمانی بی‌بی‌عشرت (۱۳۹۶). بی‌اخلاقی علمی در میان دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی. فصلنامه اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، ۱۲(۲)، ۱۱۶-۱۰۵.
Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J. (2017). How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders? Journal of Academic Ethics, 15, 115-124.
همتی، رضا و بیات، اکرم (۱۳۹۷). مطالعه پدیدارشناختی تجربه زیسته دانشجویان از فرایند نگارش پایان‌نامه. راهبرد فرهنگ، ۴۳، ۱۲۲-۸۹.
Curtis, G. J., Clare, J., Rundle, K., Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., & Seeland, J. (2022). Contract cheating: An introduction to the problem. In Contract cheating in higher education: Global perspectives on theory, practice, and policy (pp. 1-13). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Ahsan, K., Akbar, S., & Kam, B. (2022). Contract cheating in higher education: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 523-539.
Diksha, J., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ajzen, I. (1969). The prediction of behavior intentions in a choice situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5(4), 400-416.
DiPietro, M. (2010). 14: theoretical frameworks for academic dishonesty: a comparative review. To improve the academy, 28(1), 250-262.
Ali, H. I. H., & Alhassan, A. (2021). Fighting contract cheating and ghostwriting in Higher Education: Moving towards a multidimensional approach. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-18.
Eaton, S. E., Chibry, N., Toye, M. A., & Rossi, S. (2019). Interinstitutional perspectives on contract cheating: a qualitative narrative exploration from Canada. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(1), 9.
Ataei-Ashtiani, B. (2016). Curbing Iran’s Academic Misconduct. Science, 351(6279), 1273–1274.
Fletcher, J. (1966). Situational ethics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Awdry, R., & Ives, B. (2023). International predictors of contract cheating in higher education. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 193-212.
Hamza, M. A., Al Assadi, F. R., Khojah, A. A., AlHanaki, R. M., Alotaibi, N. T., Kheimi, R. M. & Marar, S. D. (2022). Contract Cheating and Ghostwriting among University Students in Health Specialties. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(5), 536-544.
Awdry, R., & Newton, P. M. (2019). Staff views on commercial contract cheating in higher education: a survey study in Australia and the UK. Higher Education, 78, 593-610.
Heath T (2002) A Quantitative Analysis of PhD Students’ Views of Supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41-53.
Bandura, Albert (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Hemmati, R. (2023). Developments in Iranian higher education and their implications for doctoral education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5), 688-702.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
Hemmati, R. (2023). Developments in Iranian higher education and their implications for doctoral education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5), 688-702.
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., & van Haeringen, K. (2019a). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in higher education, 44(11), 1837-1856.
Johnson, L., S. Adams Becker, V. Estrada, and A. Freeman. 2014. “NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition.” https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130341/. (Accessed 3 February 2023).
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Rundle, K., Newton, P. M., Ellis, C., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019b). Contract cheating in Australian higher education: a comparison of non-university higher education providers and universities. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education.
Julia. M., Hughes. C., Mc Cabe. D (2006). Understandig Academic misconduct. Canadian Jurnal of Higher Education, 36(6):49-63.
Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. In Proceedings of 2nd International Plagiarism Conference.
Kaktiņš, L. (2018). Contract cheating advertisements: what they tell us about international students’ attitudes to academic integrity. Ethics and Education, 13(2), 268-284.
Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006, June). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. In Proceedings of 2nd international plagiarism conference (pp. 19-21).
Kazemi, A. V., & Dehnavi, A. D. (2017). The new academic proletariat in Iran. Critique, 45(1-2), 141-158.
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lancaster, T. (2019). Profiling the international academic ghostwriters who are providing low-cost essays and assignments for the contract cheating industry. Journal of Information, Communi­cation and Ethics in Society, 17(1), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2018-0040
Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J. (2017). How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders? Journal of Academic Ethics, 15, 115-124.
Lines, L. (2016). Ghostwriters guaranteeing grades? The quality of online ghostwriting services available to tertiary students in Australia. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 889-914.
Curtis, G. J., Clare, J., Rundle, K., Eaton, S. E., Stoesz, B. M., & Seeland, J. (2022). Contract cheating: An introduction to the problem. In Contract cheating in higher education: Global perspectives on theory, practice, and policy (pp. 1-13). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Makinda, H. (2019). Ethical Concerns in Ghost-Writing. Mainstreaming ethics in higher education, 413.
Diksha, J., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nagy, V., & Groves, A. (2021). Rational choice or strain? A criminological examination of contract cheating. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 33(3), 322-339.
DiPietro, M. (2010). 14: theoretical frameworks for academic dishonesty: a comparative review. To improve the academy, 28(1), 250-262.
Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education 3,1-18.
Eaton, S. E., Chibry, N., Toye, M. A., & Rossi, S. (2019). Interinstitutional perspectives on contract cheating: a qualitative narrative exploration from Canada. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 15(1), 9.
Pacino, A. (2021). An investigation into contract cheating in tertiary education, and how to combat the problem in a United Arab Emirates context. Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 2(4), 120-135.
Fletcher, J. (1966). Situational ethics. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Robson, S., & Wihlborg, M. (2019). Internationalisation of higher education: Impacts, challenges and future possibilities. European Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 127-134
Hamza, M. A., Al Assadi, F. R., Khojah, A. A., AlHanaki, R. M., Alotaibi, N. T., Kheimi, R. M. & Marar, S. D. (2022). Contract Cheating and Ghostwriting among University Students in Health Specialties. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 17(5), 536-544.
Rundle, K., Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J. (2019). Why students do not engage in contract cheating. Frontiers in psychology, 19, 1-22.
Heath T (2002) A Quantitative Analysis of PhD Students’ Views of Supervision. Higher Education Research & Development, 21(1), 41-53.
Shahghasemi, E., & Akhavan, M. (2015). Confessions of academic ghost authors: the Iranian experience. Sage Open, 5(1), 1-7
Hemmati, R. (2023). Developments in Iranian higher education and their implications for doctoral education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5), 688-702.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664-670.
Hemmati, R. (2023). Developments in Iranian higher education and their implications for doctoral education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5), 688-702.
Takrimi, A., Khojasteh Mehr, R., & Eaton, S. E. (2023). Contract Cheating in Iran: An Overview of Key Issues and a Call to Action. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 323-341.
Johnson, L., S. Adams Becker, V. Estrada, and A. Freeman. 2014. “NMC Horizon Report: 2014 Higher Education Edition.” https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130341/. (Accessed 3 February 2023).
Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and instruction, 9(3), 257-280.
Julia. M., Hughes. C., Mc Cabe. D (2006). Understandig Academic misconduct. Canadian Jurnal of Higher Education, 36(6):49-63.
Walker, M., & Townley, C. (2012). Contract cheating: A new challenge for academic honesty? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 27-44.
Kaktiņš, L. (2018). Contract cheating advertisements: what they tell us about international students’ attitudes to academic integrity. Ethics and Education, 13(2), 268-284.
Ylijoki, O. H. (2001). Master’s Thesis Writing from a Narrative Approach, Studies in Higher Education, 26:1, 21-34
Kazemi, A. V., & Dehnavi, A. D. (2017). The new academic proletariat in Iran. Critique, 45(1-2), 141-158.
Yorke, J., Sefcik, L., & Veeran-Colton, T. (2022). Contract cheating and blackmail: a risky business?. Studies in higher education, 47(1), 53-66.
Lancaster, T. (2019). Profiling the international academic ghostwriters who are providing low-cost essays and assignments for the contract cheating industry. Journal of Information, Communi­cation and Ethics in Society, 17(1), 72-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-04-2018-0040
Zimring, F. E., & Hawkins, G. J. (1973). Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lines, L. (2016). Ghostwriters guaranteeing grades? The quality of online ghostwriting services available to tertiary students in Australia. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(8), 889-914.
Aliverdinia A, & Saleh Nejad, S. (2013). A Study of Influential Factors on Students’ Participant in Cheating Behavior. Ethics in Science and Technology, 8(1), 85-93. (in Persian)
Makinda, H. (2019). Ethical Concerns in Ghost-Writing. Mainstreaming ethics in higher education, 413.
Aliverdinia A, Janaly Zadeh H, Omrani Dhkhan S. (2016). A Study on the Role of Social Learning in Academic Cheating. Social Problems of Iran. 6(2), 71-103. (in Persian)
Nagy, V., & Groves, A. (2021). Rational choice or strain? A criminological examination of contract cheating. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 33(3), 322-339.
Attaran, M.; Zeinabadi, H. R.; Tolabi, S. (2009). Selection of supervisor and supervisor-student relationship: Perspectives of doctoral graduates. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16, 129-96.
Newton, P. M. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education 3,1-18.
Dehghani G. The Study Of Students’ Satisfaction With Thesis Supervision In Tabriz University Of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education 2010. 9(4), 302-310.
Pacino, A. (2021). An investigation into contract cheating in tertiary education, and how to combat the problem in a United Arab Emirates context. Middle Eastern Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences, 2(4), 120-135.
Ebrahimi, S; Etesami, S.M; Sedighi, M; Motaweza, M; Nasri, A; Yadolahi Khalis, E and Yousefi Hamedani, E (1402). Isfahan City Statistics 1402, Isfahan City. Deputy of Planning and Human Capital Development, Statistics and Information Analysis Group. Available from https://plan.isfahan.ir/sites/isfct/files/field_content_file/statistics_seasons_tag/1402-01.pdf
Robson, S., & Wihlborg, M. (2019). Internationalisation of higher education: Impacts, challenges and future possibilities. European Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 127-134
Hemmati, R. & Bayat, A. (2018). A Phenomenological Study of Lived Experience of Students in the Process of Thesis Writing. The Culture Strategy Quarterly, (43) 11, 89-122. (in Persian)
Rundle, K., Curtis, G. J., & Clare, J. (2019). Why students do not engage in contract cheating. Frontiers in psychology, 19, 1-22.
Hemmati, R. Karimi, M. & Zamani, B. (2017). Unethical Behavior among Graduate Students. Ethics in Science and Technology. 12(2), 105-116. (in Persian)
Shahghasemi, E., & Akhavan, M. (2015). Confessions of academic ghost authors: the Iranian experience. Sage Open, 5(1), 1-7
Knapp, J. C. & Hulbert, A. M. (2016) Ghostwriting and the Ethics of Authenticity. Translated by Shah Ghasemi, E. Tehran: Jehad Daneshgahi. (in Persian)
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664-670.
Ojaghi, R. Keyvanara, M. Cheshmeh sohrabi, M. & Papi, H. (2012) Pathology Analysis of Plagiarism: A Qualitative Research. Educational development and health promotion, (9)11. (in Persian)
Takrimi, A., Khojasteh Mehr, R., & Eaton, S. E. (2023). Contract Cheating in Iran: An Overview of Key Issues and a Call to Action. Journal of Academic Ethics, 21(2), 323-341.
Rasuli, B. Nabi-Meybodi, M. Mokhtari, H. Nabavi, M. Nazari, M & Alidousti, S. (2021) Ghostwriting concept: the Study of Academic Miscundot in Iranian Higher Education Context. Academic Librarianship and Information Research, 4(54), 13-38. (in Persian)
Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and instruction, 9(3), 257-280.
Rostami, F., Zarafshani, K., Saadvandi, M., Lorghani, M (2013) Explaining Factors Influencing Pugilism in Higher Education: A Case of Agricultural College at Razi University. Iranian Higher Education. 5(3), 143-163.
Walker, M., & Townley, C. (2012). Contract cheating: A new challenge for academic honesty? Journal of Academic Ethics, 10, 27-44.
Tavakol, M., & Naseri, R. M. (2010). Plagiarism, fabrication and fraud as research misconducts: with an explanation from sociology of science. (in Persian)
Ylijoki, O. H. (2001). Master’s Thesis Writing from a Narrative Approach, Studies in Higher Education, 26:1, 21-34
Varij Kazem, A. (2018). University, From Ladder to Canopy. Institute for social and cultural studies (in Persian).
Yorke, J., Sefcik, L., & Veeran-Colton, T. (2022). Contract cheating and blackmail: a risky business?. Studies in higher education, 47(1), 53-66.
Varij Kazemi, A., and Asghri, Z. (2020) A look at phenomenon of dissertation ghost writing in Iran: Policies and the condition of possibility. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 25(4),1-22.
Zimring, F. E., & Hawkins, G. J. (1973). Deterrence: The legal threat in crime control. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Receive Date 08 June 2026
  • Publish Date 08 June 2026