Volume 14, Issue 2 (11-2023)                   Social Problems of Iran 2023, 14(2): 371-398 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

1- Guilan University
2- Guilan University , a.yaghoobi@guilan.ac.ir
Abstract:   (462 Views)
The present study deals with the qualitative study of civil family among the families of Rasht city. The population studied in this research are men and women of Rasht city, and 35 people were interviewed using the purposeful sampling method. This research was conducted using the qualitative method, with thematic analysis approach and using the interview technique, and the interviews with people went as far as it led to theoretical saturation. The findings of this research show that in terms of dialogue, the different types of families studied in Rasht city are: dialogue-oriented families, boundary families and conflict-oriented families. Based on the findings of the research, families that have more cultural and social capital are more symmetrical and dialogue-oriented. In addition, although the participants have stated that today's families are more conversation-oriented than in the past, but in reality and in the "here-now" form, boundary and conflict-oriented families are the two main forms of family. The interviewees have constructed The ideal form of the family in traits such as honesty, mutual respect, the ability to express feelings, consultation, listening to the words of other family members, equality, acceptance of criticism, non-judgment (avoid prejudice),and high capacity (having an open mind).
Full-Text [PDF 540 kb]   (113 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Original Research | Subject: Family & Marriage
Received: 2023/06/14 | Accepted: 2023/12/9 | Published: 2024/02/9

1. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385-405. [DOI:10.1177/146879410100100307]
2. Carr, K. & Kellas, J. K. (2017). The role of family and marital communication in developing resilience to family-of-origin adversity. Journal of Family Communication, 18(1), 68-84. [DOI:10.1080/15267431.2017.1369415]
3. Danczak, A. (2011). Dialogue as a means of building the spirituality of a married couple. Journal Marriage, Families & Spirituality, 17(1), 61-68.
4. Gadamer H. G. (1994). Truth and method, translation revised by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshal, New York: Continum.
5. Gadamer, Hans Georg. (1980). Dialogue and dialectic: eight hermeneuncal stuies on Plato. Translated by P. C. Smith. New Haven. Yale University Press.
6. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequency of modernity, Stanford: Stanford University press.
7. Habermas, Jurgen. (1984). The Theory of communicative action, Vol. I. Reason and Rationalization of Socket trans. Thomas McCarthy. Boston Beacon Press Boston.
8. Koerner, A.F;& Fitzpatrick, M.A. (1997). Family type and conflict: The impact of conversation orientation and conformity orientation on conflict in the family. Communication Studies, 48, 59-75. [DOI:10.1080/10510979709368491]
9. Koraei, A., Khojasteh Mhr, R., Sodami, M., & Aslami Kh. (2017). Identification of the factors contributing to satisfying stable marriages in woman. Journal of Family Counseling & Psychotherapy. 2(22), 129-164. (in Persian).
10. Meredith, Wiliam. H. Abbott, Douglas. A. Tsal, Rita. and Ming, Zheng, Fu. (1994). Healthy family functioning in Chinese cultures: An exploratory study using the Circumplex Model. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 24(1), 147-157.
11. Mohanna, Seyedeh Maryam & samani, Siamac. (2017). Parents' self-efficacy in different types of family regarding: family process and contentmodel,7(2), 1-16.
12. Parsons, T. & Bales(1955) Family, sociolization & integration process. The free press, New York.
13. Strauss, A. L & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and tichniques Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Terner, victor (1967). Betwixt and between: the liminal period in rites of passage in the forest of symbols: aspects of Ndembu ritual, Ithaca (N. Y.), London: Cornell University Press.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.