شمارۀ جدید فصلنامه (پاییز1404) منتشر شد
Volume 16, Issue 3 (9-2025)
Social Problems of Iran 2025, 16(3): 59-92 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bahador A, Shekarbeygi A, Vadiea S. (2025). The Socio-Cultural Contexts of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) with a Focus on “Circumcision” in Hormozgan Province. Social Problems of Iran. 16(3), 59-92. doi:10.61882/jspi.16.3.59
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3855-en.html
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3855-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran ,ashekarbeugister@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (377 Views)
One of the types of violence against women is genital mutilation, such as Circumcision, which causes physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women and is caused by cultural and social issues and has received less attention. The aim of the present study is to examine the “lived experience of the socio-cultural contexts of female genital mutilation centered on “Circumcision” in Hormozgan Province”. Data were collected using a social interpretive approach and a qualitative method using in-depth interview techniques. Based on the purposeful snowball sampling method and the theoretical saturation criterion, fifteen people participated in this study and their lived experience in relation to the lived experience of female genital mutilation centered on “Circumcision” was studied and analyzed. The analysis of information and the presentation of the final theory are based on the grounded theory method. According to the findings, the central category that indicates the impact of religious and family institutions in the continuation and “reproduction of the traditional pattern” has been. The causal conditions for the formation of the central phenomenon as perceived by the participants include: deception, inexperience, passivity, fear, disturbing feelings or perceptions. The conditions of various intervening factors include: traditionalism, obligation of religious norms, gender stereotypes, repressive stereotypes and cultural alienation. In order to oppose the phenomenon and interrupt it, the activists also use strategies such as: escape strategies (escape, delay) and gender empowerment. The consequences of using the strategies of the participants are: withdrawal; feminine deficiency, physical, mental and emotional damage, dissatisfaction and social confrontation.
Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
Female genital mutilation (FGM) not only lacks any medical or health benefits but also represents a form of violence and sexual abuse against girls and women. This practice jeopardizes women’s health and leads to numerous complications, including uterine infections, severe pain during sexual intercourse, frequent urination, and persistent bleeding. Violence against women transcends class, race, nationality, age, religion, and ideology, and FGM—often referred to as cutting or circumcision—is one manifestation of this global phenomenon. It inflicts physical, sexual, and psychological harm and persists due to entrenched cultural and social norms that have received limited scholarly attention.
Opposition to FGM has become a major concern for women’s rights advocates, human rights activists, social movements, and international organizations such as UNICEF and the United Nations. The most extreme forms of this practice have devastating effects on women’s physical and psychological well-being and can even result in death due to bleeding or infection.
This study aims to examine the socio-cultural contexts of FGM in Hormozgan Province, focusing on the lived experiences of women who have undergone cutting. It seeks to answer the following questions: What are women’s lived experiences of FGM in Hormozgan Province? What are the socio-cultural foundations of this practice? What are its main consequences? And what strategies can help prevent or reduce it?
2. Methodology
This qualitative study employs grounded theory to explore the lived experiences and socio-cultural foundations of FGM. Participants were selected through theoretical and snowball sampling, resulting in a group of 15 women from Hormozgan Province in 2022–2023. Interviews continued until data saturation was reached.
Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews, and new participants were recruited according to emerging concepts and categories derived from the grounded theory framework. The data were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding, leading to 289 initial concepts condensed into 42 subcategories and 17 core categories. These were integrated into a paradigmatic model consisting of causal conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences centered around the core phenomenon.
To ensure validity, interviews included women of different ages and social backgrounds. Continuous comparison of data, triangulation with national and international studies, and conceptual saturation strengthened both internal and external validity.
3. Findings
Causal conditions showed that family decisions regarding cutting are shaped by local normative pressures, fear of moral stigmatization, and gender stereotypes. Mothers, often influenced by elder female relatives, face a conflict between preserving family honor and protecting their daughters’ bodily integrity.
Contextual and intervening conditions revealed that local customs outweigh religious mandates, with religion serving more as a legitimizing discourse than a genuine obligation. Ritual adherence—embedded within an “economy of morality” that links honor to control over female sexuality—plays a decisive role in maintaining the practice. Although some participants referred to strict Shafi'i interpretations, analysis showed these beliefs were intertwined with misinformation and limited access to alternative medical or religious perspectives. The findings also indicated that women’s strategies evolve over time. In childhood, strategies such as silence, avoidance, and endurance prevail, while in adulthood, negotiation, persuasion, alliance-building, and consulting midwives or physicians emerge as active strategies. These actions expand through storytelling, reframing of shame and honor, and social media advocacy. Education, urbanization, and exposure to external influences further strengthen this transformation.
The consequences are both physical and psychological: pain during intercourse, reduced pleasure, difficulty achieving sexual satisfaction, feelings of bodily violation, and traumatic recollections. A notable insight is women’s dual role—as both subjects of the practice and agents of its reproduction or transformation. Female leadership within families can either reinforce traditional norms or catalyze change when supported by education, networks, and alternative knowledge.
4. Conclusion
The conceptual framework integrates causal and intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences into a coherent model centered on the reproduction of male-centered subjectivity upon women’s bodies. This reproduction is sustained through ritual legitimacy, bodily discipline, and intergenerational transmission within kinship-based family structures and the moral economy of honor. However, intervening factors such as education, urbanization, culturally sensitive health services, and access to alternative narratives open cracks in this structure. Depending on women’s access to resources and alliances, these cracks may widen, allowing for critical forms of female agency to emerge. Consequently, outcomes range from the reinforcement of patriarchal control to the rise of a new female subjectivity that redefines bodily dignity and social value.
Extended Abstract
1. Introduction
Female genital mutilation (FGM) not only lacks any medical or health benefits but also represents a form of violence and sexual abuse against girls and women. This practice jeopardizes women’s health and leads to numerous complications, including uterine infections, severe pain during sexual intercourse, frequent urination, and persistent bleeding. Violence against women transcends class, race, nationality, age, religion, and ideology, and FGM—often referred to as cutting or circumcision—is one manifestation of this global phenomenon. It inflicts physical, sexual, and psychological harm and persists due to entrenched cultural and social norms that have received limited scholarly attention.
Opposition to FGM has become a major concern for women’s rights advocates, human rights activists, social movements, and international organizations such as UNICEF and the United Nations. The most extreme forms of this practice have devastating effects on women’s physical and psychological well-being and can even result in death due to bleeding or infection.
This study aims to examine the socio-cultural contexts of FGM in Hormozgan Province, focusing on the lived experiences of women who have undergone cutting. It seeks to answer the following questions: What are women’s lived experiences of FGM in Hormozgan Province? What are the socio-cultural foundations of this practice? What are its main consequences? And what strategies can help prevent or reduce it?
2. Methodology
This qualitative study employs grounded theory to explore the lived experiences and socio-cultural foundations of FGM. Participants were selected through theoretical and snowball sampling, resulting in a group of 15 women from Hormozgan Province in 2022–2023. Interviews continued until data saturation was reached.
Data collection was based on semi-structured interviews, and new participants were recruited according to emerging concepts and categories derived from the grounded theory framework. The data were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding, leading to 289 initial concepts condensed into 42 subcategories and 17 core categories. These were integrated into a paradigmatic model consisting of causal conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences centered around the core phenomenon.
To ensure validity, interviews included women of different ages and social backgrounds. Continuous comparison of data, triangulation with national and international studies, and conceptual saturation strengthened both internal and external validity.
3. Findings
Causal conditions showed that family decisions regarding cutting are shaped by local normative pressures, fear of moral stigmatization, and gender stereotypes. Mothers, often influenced by elder female relatives, face a conflict between preserving family honor and protecting their daughters’ bodily integrity.
Contextual and intervening conditions revealed that local customs outweigh religious mandates, with religion serving more as a legitimizing discourse than a genuine obligation. Ritual adherence—embedded within an “economy of morality” that links honor to control over female sexuality—plays a decisive role in maintaining the practice. Although some participants referred to strict Shafi'i interpretations, analysis showed these beliefs were intertwined with misinformation and limited access to alternative medical or religious perspectives. The findings also indicated that women’s strategies evolve over time. In childhood, strategies such as silence, avoidance, and endurance prevail, while in adulthood, negotiation, persuasion, alliance-building, and consulting midwives or physicians emerge as active strategies. These actions expand through storytelling, reframing of shame and honor, and social media advocacy. Education, urbanization, and exposure to external influences further strengthen this transformation.
The consequences are both physical and psychological: pain during intercourse, reduced pleasure, difficulty achieving sexual satisfaction, feelings of bodily violation, and traumatic recollections. A notable insight is women’s dual role—as both subjects of the practice and agents of its reproduction or transformation. Female leadership within families can either reinforce traditional norms or catalyze change when supported by education, networks, and alternative knowledge.
4. Conclusion
The conceptual framework integrates causal and intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences into a coherent model centered on the reproduction of male-centered subjectivity upon women’s bodies. This reproduction is sustained through ritual legitimacy, bodily discipline, and intergenerational transmission within kinship-based family structures and the moral economy of honor. However, intervening factors such as education, urbanization, culturally sensitive health services, and access to alternative narratives open cracks in this structure. Depending on women’s access to resources and alliances, these cracks may widen, allowing for critical forms of female agency to emerge. Consequently, outcomes range from the reinforcement of patriarchal control to the rise of a new female subjectivity that redefines bodily dignity and social value.
Type of Article: Original Research |
Subject:
Women
Received: 2025/06/28 | Accepted: 2025/09/24 | Published: 2025/11/22
Received: 2025/06/28 | Accepted: 2025/09/24 | Published: 2025/11/22
References
1. Akweongo, P., Jackson, E. F., Appiah-Yeboah, S., Sakeah, E., & Phillips, J. F(2021). It’sa woman’s thing: gender roles sustaining the practice of female 11 Leye 16 genital mutilation among the Kassena-Nankana of northern Ghana. Reproductive health, 18(1), 1-17.
2. Bekalo, D. B(2019). Modeling determinants of time-to-circumcision of girls: a comparison of various parametric shared frailty models. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 19(2-3), 145-174.
3. Becerra, N. et al. (2023). Attitudes and experiences around FGM/C in the United States: A scoping review.
4. Berg, R. C., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Fretheim, A., Underland, V., & Vist, G. (2014). An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the obstetric consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting. Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2014, 542859. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/542859
5. Besera, G., Goldberg, H., Okoroh, E. M., Snead, M. C., Johnson-Agbakwu, C. E., & Goodwin, M. (2023). Attitudes and Experiences Surrounding Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: A Scoping Review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 25(2), 449-482.
6. Farouki, L., El-Dirani, Z., Abdulrahim, S., Akl, C., Akik, C., & McCall, S. J. (2022). The global prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of national, regional, facility, and school-based studies. PLoS Medicine, 19(9), e1004061.
7. Ige, R. A. (2018). An Exploration of the Contributions of African Feminism to the Development of International Human Rights(Doctoral dissertation, Keele University).
8. Johansen, R. E. B., Ziyada, M. M., Shell-Duncan, B., Kaplan, A. M., & Leye, E. (2018). Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-13.
9. Johnsdotter, S. (2018). The impact of migration on attitudes to female genital cutting and experiences of sexual dysfunction among migrant women with FGC. Current sexual health reports, 10(1), 18-24.
10. Klein, E., Helzner, E., Shayowitz, M., Kohlhoff, S., & Smith-Norowitz, T. A. (2018). Female genital mutilation: health consequences and complications—a short literature review.
11. Kopelman L.M. (2012). Female Circumcision and Genital Mutilation, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics(Second Edition). 285-294.
12. Kubai, F. K(2023). Persistence Of Female Genital Mutilation In Kenya: A Case(Doctoral dissertation, Mount Saint Vincent University).
13. María del, Mar Pastor-Bravo, PilarAlmansa-Martínez123IsmaelJiménez-Ruiz(2021), Factors contributing to the perpetuation and eradication of female genital mutilation/ Cutting in sub-Saharan women living in Spain, Midwifery, In Press, Journal Pre-proofWhat are Journal Pre-proof articles? Available online 21 November 2021, 103207
14. Martinelli, M., & Olle-Goig, J.E. (2012). Female genital mutilation in Djibouti. Afr Health Sci, 12(4), 412-5.
15. Mkuwa, S., Sempeho, J., Kimbute, O., Mushy, S. E., Ndjovu, A., Mfaume, J., & Ngalesoni, F(2023). The role of communities and leadership in ending female genital mutilation in Tanzania: an exploratory cross-sectional qualitative study in Tanga. BMC public health, 23(1), 1-8.
16. Elbendary, R. N., Shokry, D. A., Deeb, W. S., & Morsi, E. M. (2021). Female genital mutilation (FGM): Is it still an existing problem in Egypt?. Forensic science international, 318, 110574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110574
17. Pashaie, T., Rahimi, A., Ardalan, A., & Majlesi, F. (2012). Prevalence of female genital mutilation and factors associated with it among women consulting health centers in Ravansar City, Iran. Sjsph, 9(4), 57-68.
18. Patricia, C(2021). The Role of Socio-Economic Factors on the Continuation of Female Genital Mutilation in Africa: A Critical Analysis of Kenya.
19. Simbar, M., Abdi, F., Zaheri, F., & Mokhtari, P. (2014). Outcomes of circumcision in women: a review of existing studies. Hakim Jorjani J, 2(1), 10-1.
20. Sipsma, H.L. et al. (2012). Female genital cutting: current practices and beliefs in western Africa. Bulletin World Health Organisation, 90(2), 120-127.
21. Wahlberg, A., Essén, B., & Johnsdotter, S. (2019). From sameness to difference: Swedish Somalis’ post-migration perceptions of the circumcision of girls and boys. Culture, health & sexuality, 21(6), 619-635.
22. Waigwa, S., Doos, L., Bradbury-Jones, C., & Taylor, J. (2018). Effectiveness of health education as an intervention designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting(FGM/C): a systematic review. Reproductive health, 15, 1-14.
23. World Health Organization (2015). Female genital mutilation: a joint WHO. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
24. Abbott, P., & Wallace, C. (2001). Sociology of women (M. Najm Araghi, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing. (Original work published in Persian)
25. Ahadi, H., Khediozadeh, T., Seydi Alavi, G., & Esmaeili, H. (2003). Female circumcision in Minab: Prevalence, awareness, and attitudes. Qazvin University of Medical Sciences Journal, 7(28), 14–17.
26. Ahmadi, K. (2021). Policies related to the culture of female circumcision/female genital mutilation in Iran. Psychology, Social Sciences and Educational Sciences, 5(2), 178–189.
27. Akweongo, P., Jackson, E. F., Appiah-Yeboah, S., Sakeah, E., & Phillips, J. F(2021). It’sa woman’s thing: gender roles sustaining the practice of female 11 Leye 16 genital mutilation among the Kassena-Nankana of northern Ghana. Reproductive health, 18(1), 1-17.
28. Barzin Khalifehlu, M. (2015). Female genital mutilation in Iranian jurisprudence and law. Islamic Law, (46), 67–79.
29. Becerra, N. et al. (2023). Attitudes and experiences around FGM/C in the United States: A scoping review.
30. Bekalo, D. B(2019). Modeling determinants of time-to-circumcision of girls: a comparison of various parametric shared frailty models. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 19(2-3), 145-174.
31. Berg, R. C., Odgaard-Jensen, J., Fretheim, A., Underland, V., & Vist, G. (2014). An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the obstetric consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting. Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2014, 542859. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/542859
32. Besera, G., Goldberg, H., Okoroh, E. M., Snead, M. C., Johnson-Agbakwu, C. E., & Goodwin, M. (2023). Attitudes and Experiences Surrounding Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting in the United States: A Scoping Review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 25(2), 449-482.
33. Bostan, H. (2003). Functions of the family from the perspectives of Islam and feminism. Methodology of Humanities Quarterly, 9(35), 4–34.
34. Chitsaz, M. (2023). The Iranian family and socio-cultural transformations: A generational analysis. Iranian Journal of Social Issues, 14(1), 89–112.
35. De Beauvoir, S. (2001). The second sex (Q. Sanavi, Trans.; 2 vols.). Tehran: Toos Publishing. (Original work published in French)
36. Elbendary, R. N., Shokry, D. A., Deeb, W. S., & Morsi, E. M. (2021). Female genital mutilation (FGM): Is it still an existing problem in Egypt?. Forensic science international, 318, 110574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110574
37. Estiri, S. (2017). A jurisprudential-sociological analysis of post-birth rulings for newborn girls (A case study of female circumcision) (Master’s thesis, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran).
38. Farouki, L., El-Dirani, Z., Abdulrahim, S., Akl, C., Akik, C., & McCall, S. J. (2022). The global prevalence of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of national, regional, facility, and school-based studies. PLoS Medicine, 19(9), e1004061.
39. Ghaderzadeh, O., & Abdollahzadeh, M. (2022). Men’s experiences and understandings of gender-based violence in Sanandaj: Contexts and consequences. Iranian Journal of Social Issues, 13(1), 109–130.
40. Ige, R. A. (2018). An Exploration of the Contributions of African Feminism to the Development of International Human Rights(Doctoral dissertation, Keele University).
41. Johansen, R. E. B., Ziyada, M. M., Shell-Duncan, B., Kaplan, A. M., & Leye, E. (2018). Health sector involvement in the management of female genital mutilation/cutting in 30 countries. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-13.
42. Johnsdotter, S. (2018). The impact of migration on attitudes to female genital cutting and experiences of sexual dysfunction among migrant women with FGC. Current sexual health reports, 10(1), 18-24.
43. Klein, E., Helzner, E., Shayowitz, M., Kohlhoff, S., & Smith-Norowitz, T. A. (2018). Female genital mutilation: health consequences and complications—a short literature review.
44. Kopelman L.M. (2012). Female Circumcision and Genital Mutilation, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics(Second Edition). 285-294.
45. Kubai, F. K(2023). Persistence Of Female Genital Mutilation In Kenya: A Case(Doctoral dissertation, Mount Saint Vincent University).
46. María del, Mar Pastor-Bravo, PilarAlmansa-Martínez123IsmaelJiménez-Ruiz(2021), Factors contributing to the perpetuation and eradication of female genital mutilation/ Cutting in sub-Saharan women living in Spain, Midwifery, In Press, Journal Pre-proofWhat are Journal Pre-proof articles? Available online 21 November 2021, 103207
47. Martinelli, M., & Olle-Goig, J.E. (2012). Female genital mutilation in Djibouti. Afr Health Sci, 12(4), 412-5.
48. Mkuwa, S., Sempeho, J., Kimbute, O., Mushy, S. E., Ndjovu, A., Mfaume, J., & Ngalesoni, F(2023). The role of communities and leadership in ending female genital mutilation in Tanzania: an exploratory cross-sectional qualitative study in Tanga. BMC public health, 23(1), 1-8.
49. Moghaddami, N. (2013). Female circumcision in Iran and the necessity of criminal protections (Master’s thesis, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Faculty of Law and Theology).
50. Mozaffarian, R. (2011). A study of social and cultural factors involved in female circumcision in Qeshm Island (Master’s thesis, University of Shiraz, Faculty of Economics, Department of Demography).
51. Pashaie, T., Rahimi, A., Ardalan, A., & Majlesi, F. (2012). Prevalence of female genital mutilation and factors associated with it among women consulting health centers in Ravansar City, Iran. Sjsph, 9(4), 57-68.
52. Patricia, C(2021). The Role of Socio-Economic Factors on the Continuation of Female Genital Mutilation in Africa: A Critical Analysis of Kenya.
53. Riahi, M., Bahrami-Kakavand, S., & Aliverdinia, A. (2007). A sociological analysis of the tendency toward divorce (Case study: Kermanshah County). Women’s Studies, 5(3), 109–140.
54. Shojaei, M., Tavassoli, A., & Mousavi, H. (2023). Urban neighborhood transformations and childhood experiences of mothers and daughters living in Tehran. Iranian Journal of Social Issues, 14(2), 103–127.
55. Simbar, M., Abdi, F., Zaheri, F., & Mokhtari, P. (2014). Outcomes of circumcision in women: a review of existing studies. Hakim Jorjani J, 2(1), 10-1.
56. Simbar, M., Haji Faghaha, M., Golazar, S., & Alizadeh, Sh. (2016). Female circumcision: Religious obligation or cultural coercion? Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility, 19(25), 8–16.
57. Sipsma, H.L. et al. (2012). Female genital cutting: current practices and beliefs in western Africa. Bulletin World Health Organisation, 90(2), 120-127.
58. Wahlberg, A., Essén, B., & Johnsdotter, S. (2019). From sameness to difference: Swedish Somalis’ post-migration perceptions of the circumcision of girls and boys. Culture, health & sexuality, 21(6), 619-635.
59. Waigwa, S., Doos, L., Bradbury-Jones, C., & Taylor, J. (2018). Effectiveness of health education as an intervention designed to prevent female genital mutilation/cutting(FGM/C): a systematic review. Reproductive health, 15, 1-14.
60. World Health Organization (2015). Female genital mutilation: a joint WHO. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC).
