Volume 10, Issue 1 (9-2019)                   Social Problems of Iran 2019, 10(1): 81-99 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rezaie Daredeh M, Naghdi A. (2019). A Study on Social formation Processes of Youth Negative Emotions towards Afghan Residents’ Labor Market in Shiraz. Social Problems of Iran. 10(1), 81-99.
URL: http://jspi.khu.ac.ir/article-1-3318-en.html
1- PhD Student in Sociology, University of Shahid Beheshti , m.rezaie2006@yahoo.com
2- Associate Professor, BouAli University of Hamedan
Abstract:   (993 Views)
Corruption as one of the realities of today's society has had unprecedented growth in the administrative, political and economic systems of the world and according to the International Transparency Institute, no region or country in the world is immune to corruption. In this article, with theoretical speculations, we are looking for a comparative study of the necessary and sufficient conditions for the necessary outcome: the control of macroeconomic corruption. Based on the theoretical framework, we have identified three dimensions or three constraints for corruption control: the rule of law, political development, and economic development. The methodology of this research is qualitative and comparative. The data of 14 countries have been analyzed using a fuzzy approach and include positive and negative cases. Research findings suggest that the rule of law, political development, and economic development are each a necessary condition for the outcome of corruption control. In causal and hybrid causalities, only one causal route was necessary based on adequacy and the index of compatibility and cover index. In this causal direction, the rule of law, political development, and economic development combined provided the necessary causality to produce the desired result. Compatibility index of the remaining rout is 0.97 and it covers 84% of the changes in the variable which is of acceptable theoretical and empirical importance. Therefore, generally, these causes have significant explanatory power in the analysis of the countries under investigation.
Full-Text [PDF 1223 kb]   (727 Downloads)    
Type of Article: Original Research |
Received: 2021/01/9 | Accepted: 2019/09/1 | Published: 2019/09/1

References
1. آمارتیاسن (1381) توسعه به مثابه آزادی، ترجمة وحید محمودی، تهران: دانشگاه تهران.
2. اوغلو، دارون عجم و جیمز‌ای رابینسون (1396) چرا ملت‌ها شکست می‌خورند؟ ریشه‌‌های قدرت، ثروت و فقر، ترجمة محسن میردامادی و محمد حسین نعیمی‌پور، تهران: روزنه.
3. چلبی، مسعود (1394) جامعه شناسی نظم تشریح و تحلیل نظری نظم اجتماعی، تهران: نی.
4. چلبی، مسعود (1395) تحلیل نظری و تطبیقی در جامعه‌شناسی، تهران: نی.
5. چلبی، مسعود (1388) «شاخص‌سازی و تابع عضویت فازی: نوع‌شناسی و واسنجی در جامعه‌شناسی»، مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، زمستان، دورة سوم، شمارة 4: 1-20.
6. ریگین، چارلز (1394) روش تطبیقی: فراسوی راهبرد‌های کمی و کیفی، ترجمة محمد فاضلی، تهران: آگه.
7. سامتی، مرتضی، همایون رنجبر و فضیلت محسنی (1390) «تحلیل تأثیر شاخص‌‌های حکمرانی خوب بر شاخص توسعة انسانی، مطالعه موردی: کشور‌های جنوب شرقی آسیا»، فصلنامة پژوهش‌‌های رشد و توسعۀ اقتصادی، سال اول، شماره 4: 183-223.
8. فاضلی، محمد و محدثه جلیلی کناری (1391) «تبیین سطح فساد: بررسی تطبیقی اثر کیفیت حاکمیت و حکمرانی خوب»، فصلنامة راهبرد اجتماعی و فرهنگی، سال دوم، شمارة 5: 7-40.
9. میدری، احمد و جعفر خیرخواهان (1383) حکمرانی خوب: بنیان توسعه، تهران: مجلس شورای اسلامی، مرکز پژوهشها.
10. De Graaf , Gjalt; Maravic, Partick Von; Waggenaar, Pieter (2010) The Good Cause: Theoretical Perspectives on Corruption, Barbara Budrich Publishers Opladen & Farmington Hills. [DOI:10.3224/86649263]
11. Hagard, s. Macintyre, A. and Tiede, L. (2007) The Rule of Law and Economic Development, by University of California - San Diego.
12. Lambsdorff, Johann Graf (2005) Consequences and Causes of Corruption What do We Know from a Cross-Section of Countries? Diskussionspapiere: Volkswirtschaftliche Reihe, No. V-34-05.
13. Lindstedt Catharina & Naurin Daniel (2011) Transparency against Corruption, Department of Political Science Goteborg University.
14. Kargbo, H. Abubakar (2006) Corruption: Definition and Concept Manifestations and Typology in the Africa Context.
15. Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay Aart and Mastruzzi Massimo (2004) Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004, The World Bank. [DOI:10.2139/ssrn.718081]
16. Morris, Stephen and Klesner Joseph (2010) Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43 (10) 1258 - 1285. [DOI:10.1177/0010414010369072]
17. Nicolescu-Waggonner, Cristina (2016) No Rule of Law, No Democracy:
18. Conflicts of Interest, Corruption, and Elections as Democratic Deficits, State Univ of New York Pr.
19. Pellegrini, Lorenzo & Gerlagh Reyer (2008) Causes of Corruption: A Survey of Crosscountry Analyses and Extended Results, Econ Gov. 9: 245-263. [DOI:10.1007/s10101-007-0033-4]
20. Stapenhurst, Rich & Johnston, Niall & Pellizo, Riccardo (2006) The Role of Parliament in Curbing Corruption, WBI Development Studies. [DOI:10.1596/978-0-8213-6723-0]
21. Treisman, Daniel (2000) The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-national Study. Journal of Public Economics, 76: 399-457. [DOI:10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4]
22. Transparency international: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2011/results.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Journal of Social Problems of Iran

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb